BAD OMEN
So we're on our way out the door to catch tonight's DFW reading but not before reading his review of the Williamson Borges bio for Sunday's Times, and it's just replete with the kind of annoying, excessive footnotey nonsense that drives us to despair with him. Yes, we know you're a smarty, and yes, we know you're prolix but come on. Does anyone think this kind of thing is still cute?
Or are we just being unreasonably crabby?
Not a promising start.

I'm back from the thing - I thought: http://www.litwack.org/injection/archives/000951.html
You?
Posted by: geoff | November 05, 2004 at 10:59 PM
I grant you prolix - Julian Barnes tilting at Sartre's biography of Flaubert is a lot more fun ( in Something to declare, Picador 2002). But he does have a point, that kind of bio is annoying.
Posted by: genevieve | November 06, 2004 at 06:01 AM
I actually liked the review, though I thought it sounded at least one wrong note: "Think about it--the personal lives of most people who spend 14 hours a day sitting there alone, reading and writing, are not going to be thrill rides to hear about." That's a great sentence up until those last three words.
Posted by: Ron | November 06, 2004 at 09:23 PM