Barking at the Moon


  • ** Recently Updated

TEV DEFINED


  • The Elegant Variation is "Fowler’s (1926, 1965) term for the inept writer’s overstrained efforts at freshness or vividness of expression. Prose guilty of elegant variation calls attention to itself and doesn’t permit its ideas to seem naturally clear. It typically seeks fancy new words for familiar things, and it scrambles for synonyms in order to avoid at all costs repeating a word, even though repetition might be the natural, normal thing to do: The audience had a certain bovine placidity, instead of The audience was as placid as cows. Elegant variation is often the rock, and a stereotype, a cliché, or a tired metaphor the hard place between which inexperienced or foolish writers come to grief. The familiar middle ground in treating these homely topics is almost always the safest. In untrained or unrestrained hands, a thesaurus can be dangerous."

SEARCH ME

« NOW PAY ATTENTION, 007 FANS | Main | REMAINS OF AGAINST THE DAY »

November 27, 2006

THREE-MINUTE INTERVIEW (3MI): JONATHAN LETHEM ON DANIEL FUCHS

Jonathanletheminhisyaddostudio We first became aware of Daniel Fuchs via last year's collection The Golden West from Black Sparrow Books, which was urged on us by none other than Sam Tanenhaus himself, who felt we'd respond to the Los Angeles subject matter of this fine collection.  He was right, and thus we were excited to receive a copy of Black Sparrow's Brobdingnagian one-volume paperback reissue of Fuch's three novels - The Brooklyn Novels, as they're now known, written before he decamped for the sunnier climes of La-La land.  The book sports a fine introduction by the talented Jonathan Lethem (Motherless Brooklyn, The Fortress of Solitude), so we thought we'd drop him a line and see if he wanted to chat about Fuchs for this latest installment of 3MI.  Remember the rules - three questions custom-designed, the last two the same for all comers.  And we're off.

TEV: The shelves of Yaddo seem to be a spawning ground for rediscovering authors, especially the practitioners of realism. (Fuchs for you, Fox for Franzen.) Given that Fuchs' work is so steeped in a tradition of 1930s realism, what do you think his relevance and value to contemporary audiences is (especially for those Beyond Brooklyn), and what case would you make for giving his work a second look? (And this is from someone who is more generously disposed to the realist tradition than a lot of readers and writers seem to be these days.)

JL:  Well, not to begin grousing at your questions right out of the gate, but I feel obliged to try to undermine the categorical imperative infesting your question about my stumbling across Fuchs in the Yaddo library all those years ago. I'd never describe my response as being: "Hey, wow, this example of 1930's realism is a promising one, possibly of interest despite/because of its relation to that tradition..." (Nor was I thinking "Franzen found Fox in here... gotta get something of my own... maybe it's in the "F's" too..." -- though I mention it because this self-generated image made me laugh...I'd forgotten until you reminded me that J-Franz located P-Fox on those same shelves.) What happened instead is I fell, swooningly, in love with Fuchs voice. A simple thing, that, though it needless to say can't and doesn't happen enough. His screwy, intimate, fresh and utterly persuasive evocation of a Williamsburg tenement sang to me, beckoned across the dusty years. The Yaddo library is a good test of such things, since they've removed all the dust jackets from the books, so you're not triangulating your reader's response to an unknown name like Fuchs against flap copy, blurbs and the like. No claim of importance or relevance to any tradition, either from Fuchs' peers and contemporary reviewers or any retrospective critical authority, was there to nudge me and my encounter into this or that intellectual continuum -- I was merely reading. And if, say, his sweet and seamy New York characters had begun donning alligator suits and descending into the sewers, or been harangued by a prophetic talking bird, or (ahem) found a magic ring and begun attempting to use it to fly, I'd have gone to those places with them, however surprising those turns might have been. And his glorious language, and the way he uses it to express the dreaminess in his ghetto-bound characters, contains its own element of fantasy, hinting everywhere at life's possibilities of rapturous strangeness and escape. I wasn't, then -- or, actually, now -- so clearly aware of what the '30's realist tradition' was, so I couldn't be holding him against it. Hemingway? Not close. I don't mean I wasn't, inevitably, making comparisons, but they were my own eccentric and anachronistic ones. He seemed like a precursor to Jerome Charyn, a non-graphic Will Eisner, a less-neurotic Henry Roth. His portrayal of inner-city childhood reminded me of certain of my favorite Lenny Bruce routines (do you know the one about the kid who goes into the toy store for airplane glue to sniff?).

Forgive my curmudgeonliness. This morning I also feel like an enemy of the word *relevance*. (In fact, it may have been at least partly the fear that he was insufficiently 'relevant' -- a value "proletarian" writers were supposed to exhibit, back in Fuchs' day -- that drove him from continuing to write fiction.) Save us from relevance. Read Fuchs for Fuchs, he's like no one else, that being the only relevance literature requires.

TEV: Fuchs headed to Hollywood but unlike Fitzgerald and Faulkner (with whom he collaborated), he neither imploded nor became embittered.  Rather, he seemed to thrive in the vanilla sunshine and wrote without disdain about being a writer for the studios. (I love his "A Hollywood Diary" from last year's collection The Golden West; it's a wonderful bit of freeze-frame of a bygone era when screenwriters were contract workers.) Do you think his unwillingness to at least bite the hand that fed him contributed in any way to his marginalization by East Coast Literary Types?

JL:  Yes, he's refreshingly clear-eyed and good-humored about the advantages and disadvantages of writing for the movies in the great era of the studio system, and provides a much less hysterical window into the fate of a studio writer than the pervasive Barton Fink images suggests. And I don't doubt (as a writer who's flitted from West Coast to East in my own subject matter, and is now about to flit back again) that there can be a self-reinforcing fascination in New York intellectual circles with local topics -- a leaning that may sometimes overrate certain dullish books that happen to be P.C.

"Read Fuchs for Fuchs, he's like no one else, that being the only relevance literature requires."

(provincially consonant) and either overlooks or patronizes books from elsewhere -- and which, even more specifically, might fail to disguise disappointment when one of its 'own' violates Eastcentricity (I remember some memoirist of NY in the '50's, though I can't remember whom, saying that a certain segment of the New York scene had never forgiven Bellow for fleeing to Chicago). But then again, how can we blame the marginalization of Fuchs-as-novelist on anyone but himself? I mean, given that he A: basically quit, and B: persistently, for decades, whenever anyone asked, downgraded his own accomplishment, claimed he'd used up what little he had to say and hence was no particular loss to the reader?

TEV: One of the attractions of the Fuchs story seems to be speculating about what might have been, the novels he might have written had he not "gone Hollywood." In his review of The Golden West, Sam Tanenhaus suggested that Fuchs had "run out of things to say," working on yet more variations of the Brooklyn novels. What's your take on all this?

Bn JL: Well, as I mentioned above (before I'd read this next question), Tanenhaus was only quoting Fuchs. My guess is that selling in the three figures could blunt anyone's sense that they had more to say. I don't know that my wish is for more Brooklyn novels, per se -- but it would have been lovely to see where Fuchs could have grown next, if something or someone had really insisted to him that his voice was remarkable and that he ought to exercise it on any subject that came to hand. Since he ended up in Hollywood, it's hard not to fantasize about a really encompassing and ambitious Hollywood novel from him -- but who knows what else was possible? Many writers are greatest *after* they use up the first thing they have to say, and take a second draught of inspiration.

TEV: Who's the best author we've never heard of?

JL: This is a perfect time to mention my favorite dark horse -- in my mind, the best postwar U.S. novelist still untouched by the present revival boom (is it because he's Left Coastish?): Don Carpenter. Berkeley born and raised, lived most of his life in Mill Valley -- except, yes, for stints in Hollywood, where he wrote in the fading days of the studio system, squeezed out one great proto-indie movie (PAYDAY, with Rip Torn), and stuck better than Fuchs to writing fiction. Hence produced, after first two great novels HARD RAIN FALLING (a terrific prison novel which helped inspire THE FORTRESS OF SOLITUDE) and BLADE OF LIGHT (which, incidentally, looks to have been an uncredited source for the movie SLINGBLADE), a string of lean and effective novels of '70's show business: THE TRUE LIFE STORY OF JODY McKEEGAN, A COUPLE OF COMEDIANS, and TURNAROUND. Carpenter was among other things, a great writer on the subject of gambling -- pool and poker, specifically -- and that made him particularly apt in his depiction of the fate of art, including his own, in a money town.

TEV: And, finally, ask yourself any question you like - but be sure to answer it.

JL: Any other introductions or afterwards coming out? Well, I've just written a new introduction for Penguin to a book that so far as I know has never been out of print, but doesn't have the stature I think it rates: WE HAVE ALWAYS LIVED IN THE CASTLE, by Shirley Jackson. In the new edition I compare the book to Charles Portis, Henry James, WHATEVER HAPPENED TO BABY JANE? and Beckett, which suggests pretty well what I think of it. I also just wrote an introduction for a small-press limited edition of a great surrealist noir novel called THE DEADLY PERCHERON, by John Franklin Bardin. Finally, I'm helping preside over the utter and irreversible canonization of one of my (formerly outsider) heroes, Philip K. Dick: I'm writing endnotes for The Library of America, which is doing a volume of four of his novels from the sixties, which I also helped select. After that, I'm out of the scholarship game, for a while: time to start a new novel (unless someone rescues Don Carpenter...)

Comments

Nice to see JL offer some props to Charyn, who seems to be continually ignored by both literary and mystery crowds alike, and to add his stamp of approval to "We Have Always Lived in the Castle", which is one of the most perfect little short novels I've read, right up there with Pop 1280--but maybe I lump those two together because I discovered them both at the same time.

I have some letters in my storage room that Daniel Fuchs wrote me '88-'90 - good man, possibly a great writer. As I wrote someplace (though can't recall if it was published) his last novel West Of The Rockies is somewhat akin to Blanchot on a visit to Palm Springs. And Low Company throws down, to use skate-speak of old. And Don Carpenter - a friend of Brautigan, if I ain't mistaken - deserves a second look too.

Holy shit: Don Carpenter. I haven't thought of him in 30 years. Nor has anyone else, apparently. But he was great, true enough. A little bio:

http://doncarpenterpage.com/bio.htm

You're right, CPL - he was a friend of Brautigan's:

http://brautigan.cybernetic-meadows.net/tiki-index.php?page=Don+Carpenter

On the same site, there's a great review by Carpenter of Brautigan's Trout Fishing in America from 1967

I happened across Carpenter in the late 70s, when I noticed that Brautigan's short story collection, Revenge of the Lawn, was dedicated to him.

BTW Mark, apparently you broke some news with this little interview (which was terrific, btw):

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/11/28/arts/NA_A-E_BKS_US_Philip_K._Dick.php

Post a comment

RECOMMENDED

  • Diary of a Bad Year by J. M. Coetzee

    Yr

    Now, on the one hand, you scarcely need us to alert you to the existence of a new J.M. Coetzee novel, or even to have us tell you it's worth reading. But we can tell you - we insist on telling you that Diary of a Bad Year is a triumph, easily Coetzee's most affecting and fully wrought work since Disgrace. Formally inventive, the book intertwines two narratives with the author's own Strong Opinions, a series of seemingly discrete philosophical and political essays. The cumulative effect of this strange trio is deeply moving and thought provoking. It's increasingly rare in this thoroughly post-post-modern age to raise the kind of questions in fiction Coetzee handles so masterfully - right down to what is it, exactly, that we expect (or need) from our novels. It's telling that, for all of his serious pronouncements on subjects ranging from censorship to pedophilia to the use of torture, it's finally a few pages from The Brothers Karamazov that brings him to tears. Moving, wise and - how's this for a surprise - funny and lightly self-mocking, Diary of a Bad Year might well be the book of the year and Coetzee is surely our essential novelist. We haven't stopped thinking about it since we set it down.
  • The Indian Clerk by David Leavitt

    Tic_2

    David Leavitt's magnificent new novel tells the story of the unlikely friendship between the British mathematician G.H. Hardy and Srinivasa Ramanujan, mathematical autodidact and prodigy who had been working as a clerk in Madras, and who would turn out to be one of the great mathematical minds of the century. Ramanujan reluctantly joined Hardy in England - a move that would ultimately prove to his detriment - and the men set to work on proving the Riemann Hypothesis, one of mathematics' great unsolved problems. The Indian Clerk, an epic and elegant work which spans continents and decades, encompasses a World War, and boasts a cast of characters that includes Bertrand Russell, Ludwig Wittgenstein and Lytton Strachey. Leavitt renders the complex mathematics in a manner that resonates emotionally as well as intellectually, and writes with crystalline elegance. The metaphor of the prime number – divisible only by one and itself – is beautifully apt for this tale of these two isolated geniuses. Leavitt's control of this dense, sprawling material is impressive – astonishing, at times – and yet despite its scope, he keeps us focused on his great themes of unknowability and identity. The Indian Clerk might be set in the past but it doesn't resemble most so-called "historical fiction." Rather, it's an ageless meditation on the quests for knowledge and for the self – and how frequently the two are intertwined – that is, finally, as timeless as the music of the primes. (View our full week of coverage here.)
  • Then We Came to the End by Joshua Ferris

    Jf

    Joshua Ferris' warm and funny debut novel is an antidote to the sneering likes of The Office and Max Barry's Company. Treating his characters with both affection and respect, Ferris takes us into a Chicago ad agency at the onset of the dot-bomb. Careers are in jeopardy, nerves are frayed and petty turf wars are fought. But there are bigger stakes in the balance, and Ferris' weirdly indeterminate point of view that's mostly first person plural, underscores the shared humanity of everyone who has ever had to sit behind a desk. It's a luminous, affecting debut and you can read the first chapter right here.
  • Christine Falls by Benjamin Black

    Cf

    Coming to these shores at last, John Banville's thriller, written under the nom de plume Benjamin Black, has drawn rave reviews across the pond since it first appeared last October. Those who feared Banville might turn in an overly literary effort needn't worry. Influenced by Simenon's romans durs (hard stories), Banville unspools a dark mystery set in 1950s Dublin concerning itself with, among other things, the church's trade in orphans. At the heart of the book is the coroner Quirke, a Banvillean creation on par with Alex Cleave and Freddie Montgomery. Dublin is rendered with a damp, creaky specificity – you can almost taste the whisky.
  • The Paris Review Interviews, I by The Paris Review and Philip Gourevitch

    Pri

    Scanning our Recommended selections, one might conclude we're addicted to interviews, and one would be correct. If author interviews are like crack to us, then the Paris Review author interviews must surely be the gold standard of crack (a comparison Plimpton might not have embraced). The newly issued The Paris Review Interviews, Volume I (Picador) rolls out the heavy hitters. Who can possibly turn away from the likes of Saul Bellow, T.S. Eliot, Ernest Hemingway, Jorge Luis Borges, Dorothy Parker, Robert Gottlieb and others? The interviews are formal and thoughtful but never dry and can replace any dozen "how-to" books on writing. What can be more comforting than hearing Bellow, answering a question on preparations and conception, admit "Well, I don't know exactly how it's done.” The best part of this collection? The "Volume I" in the title, with its promise of more volumes to come.
  • Above Paris

    Ap_3

    See, we’re not all literary fiction here. Princeton Architectural Press’s absolutely breathtaking Above Paris is very much the kind of thing we’re eager to bring to your attention. Between 1950 and 1972, pilot and photographer Roger Henrard recorded more than 350 images of Paris from the seat of a single-engine Piper cub, documenting Paris from its outskirts to its center. His photographs show not only Paris's famous landmarks - they also give you a sense of the way the city is interconnected: the tight-knit medieval districts as well as the expansive geometry of the grand boulevards. Maps at the beginning of each chapter and fine captions and essays by Jean-Louis Cohen help you navigate the City of Light as never before. Just glorious.
  • The Dead Fish Museum: Stories by Charles D'Ambrosio

    Dfm

    The best short story collection we've read since ... well, certainly since we've started this blog. And we might even say "ever" if Dubliners didn't cast such a long shadow. The short story is not our preferred form but D'Ambrosio's eight brilliant stories are almost enough to convert us. Defy the conventional wisdom that short story collections don't sell and treat yourself to this marvel. (We're especially partial, naturally, to "Screenwriter".)
  • The Mystery Guest by Grégoire Bouillier
    *Now in Paperback*

    Mg

    What would you do if the woman who’d left you high and dry ten years ago called out of the blue to invite you to a party without any further explanation? If you’re French, you’d probably spend a lot of time pondering the Deeper Significance Of It All, which is exactly what Grégoire Bouillier does for the 120 hilarious pages of The Mystery Guest. This slim, witty memoir follows Bouillier through the party from hell, and is a case study in Gallic self-abasement. Before it’s all done, you’ll set fire to any turtleneck hanging in your closet and think twice before buying an expensive Bordeaux as a gift. But fear not – just when it seems that all is, indeed, random and pointless and there is no Deeper Significance, salvation arrives in the unlikely form of Virginia Woolf, and the tale ends on a note of unforced optimism. Parfait.
  • Ticknor by Sheila Heti

    Ticknor

    When George Ticknor's Life of William Hickling Prescott was published in 1864, it received rapturous notices, and reviewers were quick to point out that the long-standing friendship between Prescott and Ticknor made the latter an ideal Boswell. Sheila Heti has pulled this obscure leaf from the literary archives and fashioned a mordantly funny anti-history; a pungent and hilarious study of bitterness and promise unfulfilled. As a fretful Ticknor navigates his way through the rain-soaked streets of Boston to Prescott's house ("But I am not a late man. I hate to be late."), he recalls his decidedly one-sided lifelong friendship with his great subject. Unlike the real-life Ticknor, this one is an embittered also-ran, full of plans and intentions never realized, always alive to the fashionable whispers behind his back. Heti seamlessly inhabits Ticknor's fussy 19th-century diction with a feat of virtuoso ventriloquism that puts one in mind of The Remains of the Day. Heti's Ticknor would be insufferable if he weren't so funny, and in the end, the black humor brings a leavening poignancy to this brief tale. But don't let the size fool you — this 109-page first novel is small but scarcely slight; it is as dense and textured as a truffle.
  • The Believer Book of Writers Talking to Writers by Vendela Vida

    Bbk

    No, your eyes aren't deceiving you and yes, we are recommending a Believer product. Twenty-three interviews (a third presented for the first time) pairing the likes of Zadie Smith with Ian McEwan, Jonathan Lethem with Paul Auster, Edward P. Jones and ZZ Packer, and Adam Thirwell with Tom Stoppard make this collection a must-read. Lifted out of the context of some of the magazine's worst twee excesses, the interviews stand admirably on their own as largely thoughtful dialogues on craft. A handful of interviewers seem more interested in themselves than in their subjects but in the main this collection will prove irresistible to writers of any stripe - struggling or established - and to readers seeking a window into the creative process.
  • The Sea by John Banville

    Sea_1

    John Banville's latest novel returns him to the Booker Prize shortlist for the first time since 1989's The Book of Evidence. In The Sea, we find Banville in transition, moving from the icy, restrained narrators of The Untouchable, Eclipse and Shroud toward warmer climes. Max Morden has returned to the vacation spot of his youth as he grieves the death of his wife. Remembering his first, fatal love, Morden works to reconcile himself to his loss. Banville's trademark linguistic virtuosity is everpresent but some of the chilly control is relinquished and Max mourns and rages in ways that mark a new direction for Banville - and there's at least one great twist which you'll never see coming. Given the politicized nature of the British literary scene, Banville's shot at the prize might be hobbled by his controversial McEwan review but we're rooting for our longtime favorite to go all the way at last. UPDATE: Our man won!
  • Here Is Where We Meet by John Berger

    Berger

    We've been fans of Booker Prize winner John Berger for ages, and we're delighted to have received an early copy of his latest work, Here is Where We Meet. In this lovely, elliptical, melancholy "fictional memoir," Berger traverses European cities from Libson to Geneva to Islington, conversing with shades from his past – He encounters his dead mother on a Lisbon tram, a beloved mentor in a Krakow market. Along the way, we're treated to marvelous and occasionally heart-rending glimpses of an extraordinary life, a lyrical elegy to the 20th century from a man who - in his eighth decade - remains committed to his political beliefs and almost childlike in his openness to people, places and experiences. There's no conventional narrative here, and those seeking plot are advised to look elsewhere. But Here is Where We Meet offers a wise, moving and poetic look at the life of an artist traversing the European century from a novelist whose talent remains undimmed in his twilight years.
  • Home Land by Sam Lipsyte

    Slc

    In his recent TEV guest review of Home Land, Jim Ruland called Sam Lipsyte the "funniest writer of his generation," and we're quite inclined to agree.  We tore through Home Land in two joyful sittings and can't remember the last time we've laughed so hard.   Lipsyte's constellation of oddly sympathetic losers is rendered with a sparkling, inspired prose style that's sent us off in search of all his prior work. In Lewis Miner's (a.k.a Teabag) woeful epistolary dispatches to his high school alumni newsletter ("I did not pan out."), we find an anti-hero for the age.  Highly, highly recommended.

SECOND LOOK

  • The Bookshop by Penelope Fitzgerald

    Bs

    Penelope Fitzgerald's second novel is the tale of Florence Green, a widow who seeks, in the late 1950s, to bring a bookstore to an isolated British town, encountering all manner of obstacles, including incompetent builders, vindictive gentry, small minded bankers, an irritable poltergeist, but, above all, a town that might not, in fact, want a bookshop. Fitzgerald's prose is spare but evocative – there's no wasted effort and her work is reminiscent of Hemingway's dictum that every word should fight for its right to be on the page. Florence is an engaging creation, stubbornly committed to her plan even as uncertainty regarding the wisdom of the enterprise gnaws at her. But The Bookshop concerns itself, finally, with the astonishing vindictiveness of which provincials are capable, and, as so much English fiction must, it grapples with the inevitabilities of class. It's a dense marvel at 123 pages, a book you won't want to – or be able to – rush through.
  • The Rider by Tim Krabbe

    Rider_4

    Tim Krabbé's superb 1978 memoir-cum-novel is the single best book we've read about cycling, a book that will come closer to bringing you inside a grueling road race than anything else out there. A kilometer-by-kilometer look at just what is required to endure some of the most grueling terrain in the world, Krabbé explains the tactics, the choices and – above all – the grinding, endless, excruciating pain that every cyclist faces and makes it heart-pounding rather than expository or tedious. No writer has better captured both the agony and the determination to ride through the agony. He's an elegant stylist (ably served by Sam Garrett's fine translation) and The Rider manages to be that rarest hybrid – an authentic, accurate book about cycling that's a pleasure to read. "Non-racers," he writes. "The emptiness of those lives shocks me."

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

BUY INDEPENDENT!