It's our turn to crow today over at the Tournament of Books, where we're set to advance either Firmin or The Road one step closer to Rooster-hood. Stop on over to find out who we chose ...
« BOOKFORUM ONLINE | Main | REMINDER: BANVILLE TONIGHT AT LAPL »
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
In his recent TEV guest review of Home Land, Jim Ruland called Sam Lipsyte the "funniest writer of his generation," and we're quite inclined to agree. We tore through Home Land in two joyful sittings and can't remember the last time we've laughed so hard. Lipsyte's constellation of oddly sympathetic losers is rendered with a sparkling, inspired prose style that's sent us off in search of all his prior work. In Lewis Miner's (a.k.a Teabag) woeful epistolary dispatches to his high school alumni newsletter ("I did not pan out."), we find an anti-hero for the age. Highly, highly recommended.
Rats don't talk? You're going to get booted out of the Legion of Vermin with rubbish like that.
Posted by: Jim | March 21, 2007 at 09:26 AM
Well, OK - maybe sailor rats talk.
Posted by: TEV | March 21, 2007 at 09:38 AM
Well, there goes Kafka.
Posted by: Jake | March 21, 2007 at 10:26 AM
Mark, I think you're right on about The Road, good going. However, while they roast you over at edrants for dismissing Firmin over the talking animal issue, what threw me farthest was the phrase "all McCarthy had to do was demonstrate a baseline of novelistic competence." Ouch. You're about to be a published writer and Savage is a fellow artist, someone who, I'm sure, busted his ass. You're not writing about John Grisham. Attack Savage for his ideas, his prose style, the plausibility of his narrative, but jeez, don't give him the equivalent of a knee to the groin. Seems like bad karma.
Posted by: Jim | March 21, 2007 at 02:24 PM
Jim, I think you're right, in retrospect. I suppose I meant to say that it would take very little to claim my vote from Firmin but the formulation is inelegant and goes too far.
Still, it's a tough call. I mean, I really deeply disliked this book. (As some people will surely dislike mine. That is an occupational hazard of putting your work out there.) So although I should not imply that Savage is incompetent - he's not - Firmin is such an embodiment of things that don't interest me novelistically that I can understand why I lapsed.
And I've been roasted at Ed's so much that there's special named after me now.
Posted by: TEV | March 21, 2007 at 02:40 PM
Hey, live and learn.
Correct or not about the animal narrative issue, the bit in the Firmin section was critical. Tough call about the "competence" comment, though? That was cruel, not critical.
Posted by: Jim | March 21, 2007 at 03:00 PM
I'm going to take "careless" over "cruel" on this one, Jim. But, as you say, live and learn.
Posted by: TEV | March 21, 2007 at 03:06 PM
You're not referring to the gourmet roadkill by chance? :)
Posted by: ed | March 22, 2007 at 08:13 PM