Barking at the Moon


  • ** Recently Updated

TEV DEFINED


  • The Elegant Variation is "Fowler’s (1926, 1965) term for the inept writer’s overstrained efforts at freshness or vividness of expression. Prose guilty of elegant variation calls attention to itself and doesn’t permit its ideas to seem naturally clear. It typically seeks fancy new words for familiar things, and it scrambles for synonyms in order to avoid at all costs repeating a word, even though repetition might be the natural, normal thing to do: The audience had a certain bovine placidity, instead of The audience was as placid as cows. Elegant variation is often the rock, and a stereotype, a cliché, or a tired metaphor the hard place between which inexperienced or foolish writers come to grief. The familiar middle ground in treating these homely topics is almost always the safest. In untrained or unrestrained hands, a thesaurus can be dangerous."

SEARCH ME

« On Reading Books in the Cities in Which They Are Set | Main | THE INDIAN CLERK: FURTHER READING # 3 »

August 22, 2007

On Literary Envy

What writer--or reader--hasn't experienced it? That stab of alarm at seeing someone else praised, or that surge of schadenfreude at seeing someone else trashed. And afterwards, the faint stench of guilt rising like steam from the wound, with its odor of corroded metal. (Note to self: Stop trying to sound like John Banville.)

I confess it: I have been guilty of the cheapest sort of envy. For example, there is a writer--she shall remain nameless--whose success, both in terms of sales and reviews, baffles me. What, I wonder, is everyone seeing that I'm not? Am I blind? Or has she sold the world a bill of goods the cheeziness of which only I detect?

In any case, every time this writer publishes a book, I have a panic attack. When someone says how wonderful she is (this happens 99% of the time) I beat my fists. When, on rare occasions, someone criticizes her, I cheer.

I don't know her. I'm sure she's a perfectly nice person. I'm sure she works as hard as I do, and tries as hard as I do to believe in herself. She probably has betes noires of her own.

About a decade ago I wrote something on this subject. In "The Term Paper Artist," a novella in my collection Arkansas, I have my hero, a writer named David Leavitt, cogitate on the fact that potential Nobel prize winners are as likely to experience fits of envy as are unpublished poets: "we are speaking, here, of the emotions of vacancy, which scale neither enhances nor mitigates; for panic and emptiness (the words are Forster's) always feel like panic and emptiness, no matter the degree."

I hereby invite readers of TEV to share their tales of literary envy--their own envy or that of others. A call for confessions, or perhaps an opportunity for us to remind one another that we are all in this human dilemma together. And that's something we can't be reminded of often enough.

Comments

I'll bet you're talking about Joyce Carol Oates. Cos she's the one who grates my nerves.

A provocative and interesting post. I've been guilty of a different specific sort of envy, the kind that accompanies reading an astonishing work that I know I can never hope to complete with. Oddly, I don't necessarily feel that with, say, Banville, perhaps because he strikes me as sui generis. But, for example, I feel a certain degree of envy whenever I read (here comes another obsession) James Wood - envy at the depth of his learning and his ability to draw connections and reach some awfully deep conclusions; thinking about literature in a way that feels hopelessly beyond my reach - almost four dimensional. I also envy the courage of someone like Zadie Smith, willing to indulge her exuberance in print, whereas sometimes I worry I'm too damned careful. I expect I'll experience more in this vein next May - especially when Andrew Sean Greer's new novel comes out the same month as mine!

In fact it isn't Joyce Carol Oates I was thinking of, though I understand what you're saying. I have to say that I've often wondered whether she would get as much flack (for publishing so much) if she were a man. Trollope must have published at least as much as JCO has!

I'm so guilty of Schadenfreude, and was in fact just writing about it today in a story I'm writing, that even airing my dirty laundry out in the blogosphere makes me feel cheap and obvious, and I don't want to be that--I want to be subtle and rise above and be exemplary. As if! Because I know a lot of writers and a lot of successful ones, and know I'm no worse than them on this issue, I enjoy the hell out of it whenever someone of note and acclaim admits to it, too. Add to that my puzzlement and superiority that few of the people I call friends see the genius I see in Joy Williams, the elegance and oblique sophistication of her hushed staccato, and I'm (very proudly) ready to be fitted for a hairshirt. That said, I've ben (of course) enjoy following this forum. Also, to TEV, I love James Wood for mostly agreeing with me and being the one who's paid to say what he says about the overexuberant young things, and the older head-scratcher choices of so many in the know. And I love David Leavitt's humility and quiet talent.

I too love Joy Williams!

Something funny (in an Oz kind of way) about writerly schadenfreude, here. (The post,rather than the comments.)
http://sarsaparillablog.net/?p=327

Can I just say that I appreciate your pointer to Penelope Fitzgerald, above, David. Someone else to look for...

There can be only one. Toni Morrison.

I'm sure I experience all these feelings too, but at the risk of sounding--what was it?--cheezy, I'd rather share a sort of quasi-admiration, quasi-appreciation I feel for TEV's own proprietorissimo as he shares with us his own writing adventures and successes. Watching Mr. Sarvas, who seems like an ordinary guy--talented, no doubt, but down to earth--finish a manuscript, grab a great agent, sell a novel, work his revisions, gives me a sort of panicky butterflies jealousy I-can-do-it-too joy. I wish him every success and congratulate him at each turn; I certainly will read (and enjoy) his novel. But I am also grateful that he's willing to go through it all publicly, for our benefit as it were. Because it's nice to see someone else's dreams come true, especially when they happen also to be your dreams. So thanks.

Note to Genevieve: the post from the Sarsaparilla blog is hilarious. FYI, I'm leaving on Sunday for Australia to take part in the Melbourne Writers' Festival. If you're there, say hello!

I am a crazy grande dame in terms of which authors I am jealous of and which I decide are worthy of success--whose success, in fact, I wish for. You, but not you. Yes, I think you're worthy. No, you're all wrong. All wrong. Please leave my sight.

Well, I am sure that you must realize that your success at an early age led a lot of people -- writers and would-be writers -- to envy you. There seemed to be a time in the 1980s when you turned up everywhere: in the New York Times commenting on the Challenger disaster (or am imagining this?), in various columns, on NPR, etc.

But, you know, it is hard to envy someone when you really admire that person's work. I read Family Dancing and really, really liked it. It didn't quite stop the feelings of envy of a guy who felt he was totally out of things in Gainesville while you seemed to be everywhere -- but certainly, it's very hard to envy someone whose work you admire deeply. I think I've read "The Term Paper Artist" half a dozen times and it's my favorite of your stories, speaking more than just about anything of its time on the life of the writer.

We all try to remember Emerson's saying that eventually smart people realize that envy is ignorance, and some of us eventually do come to believe it.

The impending Ralph Ellison novel. The big one. The big boy. The fat boy. The bad boy. The long looked-for boy.

I just know it's gonna sit on my head.

And I'll be forced to bring out the big guns. Bam Bam Bam! Bam Bam!

Another masterpiece inspired by a rival. Ain't life grand.

Thanks, Richard, for your comment. One question: are you from Gainesville? Odd that you, here in Gainesville, should have envied my being everywhere. And now my here is your former here. Or at least I think that's right.

Seriously, I love Gainesville, especially since the 2nd Street Bakery opened.

When FAMILY DANCING came out I envied David Leavitt. I thought "How could someone so young write something so good?!!"

So now it has to be Toni Morrison. DL said it wasn't Joyce Carol Oates, and didn't (couldn't?) respond to the Morrison post. So now he either has to deny it, and announce he will not respond to any further guesses - or else he's stuck with it.

Also had extreme literary envy of DL around the time of the "Lost Language of Cranes" and "Family Dancing" - in a positive way...

Is there something special about _literary_ envy, as distinct from other sorts of professional or in-group jealousy? Is it more acute, more tormented, more devious? If so, is that because, in many cases, the stakes are so small? Or because the need to write and, above all, to publish is so often bound up with self-seeking? Or are writers simply better at observing and anatomizing their own hankerings?

Funny, it hadn't even occurred to me that anyone would think I was talking about Toni Morrison.

I'm going to be discreet here but I will say that the writer in question is not nearly so famous as either JCO or TM. Envy is not always in proportion to the degree of success achieved by its object. Yet another irrational emotion.

Actually, it's the great dead who stir up the greatest envy. Pick up Dante's Comedy and you think, "Hmmm. Why even try?" Or Melville. Or Homer. Or Shakespeare. Or Whitman. But then you cry a bit - if only on the inside - and remember what they offer you. (Especially daddy Whitman who wanted/waited for/counted on his sons and daughters to justify him.) You remember how much you enjoy and need them. You try because that's why you're alive: to do your work. And maybe you remember the line from Tennyson's "Ulysses": "He works his work; I mine" - and you sit your ass in the chair again and pick up the pen.

Two questions: 1) Is she a book group favorite? 2) Jane Smiley?

That A. A. Milne really gets under my skin! I'd like to give him such a pinch! But he's dead. And you know, that's what makes me so jealous.

Not JCO, not TM, not nearly as famous as either--but someone who has to be ubiquitous: I'm thinking Francine Prose.

David, I love Gainesville, too, but I left a decade ago and have moved around since. I'm glad you are happy there. I am currently dividing myself between Brooklyn and Phoenix.

I do remember (literally) sitting at your feet (because of an overflow crowd) at a very rainy night at a reading at Three Lives & Company sometime in the late '80s, though, as I did spend summers in Manhattan.

I think more than envying others' success directly, I'm caught up--to the extent I let myself deal in envy, which I try to keep a lid on--with envying other writers' ability to get noticed and well-published. My experiencing with publishing a novel was that some kind of promotional parade for writers was going by but I had no clue how to get into it myself. Everyone told me I had to do my own promotion if I wanted my book to be noticed but no one was able to tell me HOW, starting from zero, to do it. It seemed like writers who were getting reviewed and plugged everywhere must've been somehow anointed by some secret process I wasn't in on.

I keep on writing but am still wondering how to make that transition from merely being published to being able to command some attention.

I confess that whenever I read a certain author's glowing blurbs on the book jackets of his cronies (blurbs imply that he is in a position to give his blessing to untested writers... a position of power that is mucho annoying to me), I almost want to barf with irritation. The pompous self-regard that shows through in the blurb language, the souring offness of the language itself... (I find his lack of control over language more obnoxious for all the praise that's heaped on him as a "master" of this or that.) And, like, gag me with this guy's author photo!

The bottom line is, though, that I just don't know why I find this guy so irritating, other than his career has been (undeservedly?) handed to him on a platter while I've had to claw for mine, at the same time that I see nothing much special in his work. The whole thing wouldn't bother me nearly as much if he didn't strike me as such an opportunitst, or a hack. It's like watching that one girl in high school whose only talent is for being popular--you know, the one you know has no compunction about taking more than her share of public attention (or of claiming her full privileges as queen of the beehive) because, you suspect, she knows she'd better grab while the grabbing's good--get all the breaks handed to her without having to break a sweat, basking in the glow of her popularity and reaping its rewards, while you toil away in nerdy obscurity, aceing all your math tests, writing computer programs in your spare time and tutoring your underachieving peers after school--without so much as a drop of glory being showered on you. You can dream that queen bee'll be over the hill, complete with four kids and a cheating husband by the time she's thirty-five, but twenty years is an awful long time to wait for the ground to level under both of you.

Obviously I am unmitigatingly--meanly--hoping that his every new book fails. And yes, I do feel ashamed and guilty about it.

NK Shapiro, Terry McMillan has a short essay about self-promotioning her first book. She breaks it down point by point about what she did and how she did it. I'm sure if you google it you can find it.

Also, you should be able to find helpful advice in bookstores and through writer's groups and writer's publications. There's no magic bullet, but there is advice available about doing whatever you can do to help yourself if you're willing to search it out.

Good luck to you.

Post a comment

RECOMMENDED

  • Netherland by Joseph O'Neill

    Netherland_2

    With rave reviews from James Wood, Michiko Kakutani and Dwight Garner, it might not seem like we need to tell you to drop everything and go read Netherland, but we are telling you, and here's why: The way book coverage works these days, everyone talks about the same book for about two or three weeks, and then they move on and the book is more or less forgotten. Whereas a berth here in the Recommended sidebar keeps noteworthy titles in view for a good, long time, which is the sort of sustained attention this marvelous novel deserves. A Gatsby-like meditation on exclusion and otherness, it's an unforgettable New York story in which the post 9/11 lives of Hans, a Dutch banker estranged from his English wife, and Chuck Ramkissoon, a mysterious cricket entrepreneur, intertwine. The New York City of the immigrant margins is unforgettably invoked in gorgeous, precise prose, and the novel's luminous conclusion is a radiant beacon illuminating one of our essential questions, the question of belonging. Our strongest possible recommendation.
  • Dictation: A Quartet by Cynthia Ozick

    Dictation

    "History," wrote Henry James in a 1910 letter to his amanuensis Theodora Bosanquet, "is strangely written." This casual aside could easily serve as the epigraph of Cynthia Ozick's superb new collection Dictation, which concerns itself with lost worlds evoked by languages -- languages which separate and obscure as readily as they bind. It can be risky to look for connective tissue between stories written years apart and published in magazines ranging from The Conradian to The New Yorker. But themes of deception, posterity, and above all, the glory of language -- at once malleable and intractable -- knit together this quartet, recasting the whole as the harmonious product of Ozick's formidable talent. Read the entire review here

  • Diary of a Bad Year by J. M. Coetzee

    Yr

    Now, on the one hand, you scarcely need us to alert you to the existence of a new J.M. Coetzee novel, or even to have us tell you it's worth reading. But we can tell you - we insist on telling you that Diary of a Bad Year is a triumph, easily Coetzee's most affecting and fully wrought work since Disgrace. Formally inventive, the book intertwines two narratives with the author's own Strong Opinions, a series of seemingly discrete philosophical and political essays. The cumulative effect of this strange trio is deeply moving and thought provoking. It's increasingly rare in this thoroughly post-post-modern age to raise the kind of questions in fiction Coetzee handles so masterfully - right down to what is it, exactly, that we expect (or need) from our novels. It's telling that, for all of his serious pronouncements on subjects ranging from censorship to pedophilia to the use of torture, it's finally a few pages from The Brothers Karamazov that brings him to tears. Moving, wise and - how's this for a surprise - funny and lightly self-mocking, Diary of a Bad Year might well be the book of the year and Coetzee is surely our essential novelist. We haven't stopped thinking about it since we set it down.
  • The Indian Clerk by David Leavitt

    Tic_2

    David Leavitt's magnificent new novel tells the story of the unlikely friendship between the British mathematician G.H. Hardy and Srinivasa Ramanujan, mathematical autodidact and prodigy who had been working as a clerk in Madras, and who would turn out to be one of the great mathematical minds of the century. Ramanujan reluctantly joined Hardy in England - a move that would ultimately prove to his detriment - and the men set to work on proving the Riemann Hypothesis, one of mathematics' great unsolved problems. The Indian Clerk, an epic and elegant work which spans continents and decades, encompasses a World War, and boasts a cast of characters that includes Bertrand Russell, Ludwig Wittgenstein and Lytton Strachey. Leavitt renders the complex mathematics in a manner that resonates emotionally as well as intellectually, and writes with crystalline elegance. The metaphor of the prime number – divisible only by one and itself – is beautifully apt for this tale of these two isolated geniuses. Leavitt's control of this dense, sprawling material is impressive – astonishing, at times – and yet despite its scope, he keeps us focused on his great themes of unknowability and identity. The Indian Clerk might be set in the past but it doesn't resemble most so-called "historical fiction." Rather, it's an ageless meditation on the quests for knowledge and for the self – and how frequently the two are intertwined – that is, finally, as timeless as the music of the primes. (View our full week of coverage here.)
  • Then We Came to the End by Joshua Ferris

    Jf

    Joshua Ferris' warm and funny debut novel is an antidote to the sneering likes of The Office and Max Barry's Company. Treating his characters with both affection and respect, Ferris takes us into a Chicago ad agency at the onset of the dot-bomb. Careers are in jeopardy, nerves are frayed and petty turf wars are fought. But there are bigger stakes in the balance, and Ferris' weirdly indeterminate point of view that's mostly first person plural, underscores the shared humanity of everyone who has ever had to sit behind a desk. It's a luminous, affecting debut and you can read the first chapter right here.
  • Christine Falls by Benjamin Black

    Cf

    Coming to these shores at last, John Banville's thriller, written under the nom de plume Benjamin Black, has drawn rave reviews across the pond since it first appeared last October. Those who feared Banville might turn in an overly literary effort needn't worry. Influenced by Simenon's romans durs (hard stories), Banville unspools a dark mystery set in 1950s Dublin concerning itself with, among other things, the church's trade in orphans. At the heart of the book is the coroner Quirke, a Banvillean creation on par with Alex Cleave and Freddie Montgomery. Dublin is rendered with a damp, creaky specificity – you can almost taste the whisky.
  • The Paris Review Interviews, I by The Paris Review and Philip Gourevitch

    Pri

    Scanning our Recommended selections, one might conclude we're addicted to interviews, and one would be correct. If author interviews are like crack to us, then the Paris Review author interviews must surely be the gold standard of crack (a comparison Plimpton might not have embraced). The newly issued The Paris Review Interviews, Volume I (Picador) rolls out the heavy hitters. Who can possibly turn away from the likes of Saul Bellow, T.S. Eliot, Ernest Hemingway, Jorge Luis Borges, Dorothy Parker, Robert Gottlieb and others? The interviews are formal and thoughtful but never dry and can replace any dozen "how-to" books on writing. What can be more comforting than hearing Bellow, answering a question on preparations and conception, admit "Well, I don't know exactly how it's done.” The best part of this collection? The "Volume I" in the title, with its promise of more volumes to come.
  • Above Paris

    Ap_3

    See, we’re not all literary fiction here. Princeton Architectural Press’s absolutely breathtaking Above Paris is very much the kind of thing we’re eager to bring to your attention. Between 1950 and 1972, pilot and photographer Roger Henrard recorded more than 350 images of Paris from the seat of a single-engine Piper cub, documenting Paris from its outskirts to its center. His photographs show not only Paris's famous landmarks - they also give you a sense of the way the city is interconnected: the tight-knit medieval districts as well as the expansive geometry of the grand boulevards. Maps at the beginning of each chapter and fine captions and essays by Jean-Louis Cohen help you navigate the City of Light as never before. Just glorious.
  • The Dead Fish Museum: Stories by Charles D'Ambrosio

    Dfm

    The best short story collection we've read since ... well, certainly since we've started this blog. And we might even say "ever" if Dubliners didn't cast such a long shadow. The short story is not our preferred form but D'Ambrosio's eight brilliant stories are almost enough to convert us. Defy the conventional wisdom that short story collections don't sell and treat yourself to this marvel. (We're especially partial, naturally, to "Screenwriter".)
  • The Mystery Guest by Grégoire Bouillier
    *Now in Paperback*

    Mg

    What would you do if the woman who’d left you high and dry ten years ago called out of the blue to invite you to a party without any further explanation? If you’re French, you’d probably spend a lot of time pondering the Deeper Significance Of It All, which is exactly what Grégoire Bouillier does for the 120 hilarious pages of The Mystery Guest. This slim, witty memoir follows Bouillier through the party from hell, and is a case study in Gallic self-abasement. Before it’s all done, you’ll set fire to any turtleneck hanging in your closet and think twice before buying an expensive Bordeaux as a gift. But fear not – just when it seems that all is, indeed, random and pointless and there is no Deeper Significance, salvation arrives in the unlikely form of Virginia Woolf, and the tale ends on a note of unforced optimism. Parfait.
  • Ticknor by Sheila Heti

    Ticknor

    When George Ticknor's Life of William Hickling Prescott was published in 1864, it received rapturous notices, and reviewers were quick to point out that the long-standing friendship between Prescott and Ticknor made the latter an ideal Boswell. Sheila Heti has pulled this obscure leaf from the literary archives and fashioned a mordantly funny anti-history; a pungent and hilarious study of bitterness and promise unfulfilled. As a fretful Ticknor navigates his way through the rain-soaked streets of Boston to Prescott's house ("But I am not a late man. I hate to be late."), he recalls his decidedly one-sided lifelong friendship with his great subject. Unlike the real-life Ticknor, this one is an embittered also-ran, full of plans and intentions never realized, always alive to the fashionable whispers behind his back. Heti seamlessly inhabits Ticknor's fussy 19th-century diction with a feat of virtuoso ventriloquism that puts one in mind of The Remains of the Day. Heti's Ticknor would be insufferable if he weren't so funny, and in the end, the black humor brings a leavening poignancy to this brief tale. But don't let the size fool you — this 109-page first novel is small but scarcely slight; it is as dense and textured as a truffle.
  • The Believer Book of Writers Talking to Writers by Vendela Vida

    Bbk

    No, your eyes aren't deceiving you and yes, we are recommending a Believer product. Twenty-three interviews (a third presented for the first time) pairing the likes of Zadie Smith with Ian McEwan, Jonathan Lethem with Paul Auster, Edward P. Jones and ZZ Packer, and Adam Thirwell with Tom Stoppard make this collection a must-read. Lifted out of the context of some of the magazine's worst twee excesses, the interviews stand admirably on their own as largely thoughtful dialogues on craft. A handful of interviewers seem more interested in themselves than in their subjects but in the main this collection will prove irresistible to writers of any stripe - struggling or established - and to readers seeking a window into the creative process.
  • The Sea by John Banville

    Sea_1

    John Banville's latest novel returns him to the Booker Prize shortlist for the first time since 1989's The Book of Evidence. In The Sea, we find Banville in transition, moving from the icy, restrained narrators of The Untouchable, Eclipse and Shroud toward warmer climes. Max Morden has returned to the vacation spot of his youth as he grieves the death of his wife. Remembering his first, fatal love, Morden works to reconcile himself to his loss. Banville's trademark linguistic virtuosity is everpresent but some of the chilly control is relinquished and Max mourns and rages in ways that mark a new direction for Banville - and there's at least one great twist which you'll never see coming. Given the politicized nature of the British literary scene, Banville's shot at the prize might be hobbled by his controversial McEwan review but we're rooting for our longtime favorite to go all the way at last. UPDATE: Our man won!
  • Here Is Where We Meet by John Berger

    Berger

    We've been fans of Booker Prize winner John Berger for ages, and we're delighted to have received an early copy of his latest work, Here is Where We Meet. In this lovely, elliptical, melancholy "fictional memoir," Berger traverses European cities from Libson to Geneva to Islington, conversing with shades from his past – He encounters his dead mother on a Lisbon tram, a beloved mentor in a Krakow market. Along the way, we're treated to marvelous and occasionally heart-rending glimpses of an extraordinary life, a lyrical elegy to the 20th century from a man who - in his eighth decade - remains committed to his political beliefs and almost childlike in his openness to people, places and experiences. There's no conventional narrative here, and those seeking plot are advised to look elsewhere. But Here is Where We Meet offers a wise, moving and poetic look at the life of an artist traversing the European century from a novelist whose talent remains undimmed in his twilight years.
  • Home Land by Sam Lipsyte

    Slc

    In his recent TEV guest review of Home Land, Jim Ruland called Sam Lipsyte the "funniest writer of his generation," and we're quite inclined to agree.  We tore through Home Land in two joyful sittings and can't remember the last time we've laughed so hard.   Lipsyte's constellation of oddly sympathetic losers is rendered with a sparkling, inspired prose style that's sent us off in search of all his prior work. In Lewis Miner's (a.k.a Teabag) woeful epistolary dispatches to his high school alumni newsletter ("I did not pan out."), we find an anti-hero for the age.  Highly, highly recommended.

SECOND LOOK

  • The Bookshop by Penelope Fitzgerald

    Bs

    Penelope Fitzgerald's second novel is the tale of Florence Green, a widow who seeks, in the late 1950s, to bring a bookstore to an isolated British town, encountering all manner of obstacles, including incompetent builders, vindictive gentry, small minded bankers, an irritable poltergeist, but, above all, a town that might not, in fact, want a bookshop. Fitzgerald's prose is spare but evocative – there's no wasted effort and her work is reminiscent of Hemingway's dictum that every word should fight for its right to be on the page. Florence is an engaging creation, stubbornly committed to her plan even as uncertainty regarding the wisdom of the enterprise gnaws at her. But The Bookshop concerns itself, finally, with the astonishing vindictiveness of which provincials are capable, and, as so much English fiction must, it grapples with the inevitabilities of class. It's a dense marvel at 123 pages, a book you won't want to – or be able to – rush through.
  • The Rider by Tim Krabbe

    Rider_4

    Tim Krabbé's superb 1978 memoir-cum-novel is the single best book we've read about cycling, a book that will come closer to bringing you inside a grueling road race than anything else out there. A kilometer-by-kilometer look at just what is required to endure some of the most grueling terrain in the world, Krabbé explains the tactics, the choices and – above all – the grinding, endless, excruciating pain that every cyclist faces and makes it heart-pounding rather than expository or tedious. No writer has better captured both the agony and the determination to ride through the agony. He's an elegant stylist (ably served by Sam Garrett's fine translation) and The Rider manages to be that rarest hybrid – an authentic, accurate book about cycling that's a pleasure to read. "Non-racers," he writes. "The emptiness of those lives shocks me."

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

BUY INDEPENDENT!