THURSDAY MARGINALIA: THE "ON THE ROAD" EDITION
* Yann Martel's Life of Pi has captured Abe Books' Best of the Booker survey, edging out Salman Rushdie's Midnight's Children.
* LA City Beat calls Michael Chabon's Maps and Legends "a treasure trove of intriguing and revealing looks at where Chabon goes to make up his worlds and how he tells his fables of the reconstruction."
* Steve Wasserman's book review section for Truthdig - to which we have proudly contributed - has won a Maggie Award.
* Martin Amis is collaborating on a screenplay adaptation of London Fields. (We support any venture that prevents him from holding forth on geopolitics.)
Amis is working on the screenplay with Roberta Hanley, co-founder of Muse Productions, the film production company behind indie hits such as as The Virgin Suicides, Buffalo 66 and American Psycho. It's a good fit for Amis's novel, which was omitted from the Booker prize shortlist in 1989 amid fierce debate after two of the prize's judges deemed it misogynistic. The novel centres on the character of Nicola Six, a femme fatale who foresees the exact date and manner of her own death in a dream. Not knowing who the future "murderer" might be, she manipulates three potential candidates - crook Keith Talent, rich banker Guy Clinch and terminally ill American author Samson Young - into meeting at the Black Cross pub in west London's Portobello Road for her impending death.
* We propose a moratorium on the designation "unknown writer" which seems, will, sort of cold. D. Hooijer is, presumably, known to her publishers, readers and even family. And now she's won a big, fat prize.
* Always worth your time - the wonderful Laila Lalami on Thomas McCarthy at The Nation.
* Serious props to the Cleveland Plain Dealer. In an era when books struggle to be reviewed at all, they actually return to Michael Ondaatje's Divisadero to give it a second consideration, which puts us in mind of something we believe John Freeman recently said, to the effect that Tree of Smoke deserved more than the usual milisecond of critical consideration given the time that went into its creation. And, it turns out, in this case the reviewer in question is pleased. (OK, it's short, but it's the thought that counts.)
* Ngugi wa Mirii, who was recently killed in a car accident, is remembered in an allAfrica.com editorial.
As a culture worker and artist, writer, playwright, and film-maker, Ngugi wa Mirii encouraged personal introspection and dynamic thinking which he hoped would contribute to African unity through social and cultural ideas.
"The musicians must of necessity compose lyrics that not only entertain but should educate and inform, the playwrights must dramatise the drama of life, journalists should report without fear or favour. Novelists, actors, film-makers are called upon to shed light through historical analysis," he wrote.
* And, finally - James Bond reads Benjamin Black. Who can resist? We sure can't.

Why are you joining in the Amis piling-on? The guy may be wrong, but it’s not because he isn’t incredibly brilliant and thoughtful. Hell, Hitchens is dead wrong on the war, but it doesn’t make me think any less of him – he’s simply arrived at different conclusions. And most importantly, this news about London Fields (I’ve been watching the development of this for a while) is great and has nothing to do with his latest book, so why bother mentioning it?
Posted by: Tom | May 08, 2008 at 07:46 AM
Amis is wrong, but he's not just wrong, he's wrong and vapid and silly when it comes to the issue of Islamic extremism. My problem with Amis isn't that I always disagree with him (because I don't) but that he seems to think reading a couple of books on a given subject makes you an expert on it. He read Bernard Lewis and Mark Steyn and now he thinks he knows everything there is to know about the subject. No two authors could provide that much information, and certainly not those two authors. Amis did the same sort of thing with Koba The Dread, regurgitating second-hand observations while providing nothing new.
Posted by: Nav | May 08, 2008 at 12:38 PM
Perhaps that Tree of Smoke did not garner sustained critical attention speaks to its quality and worth? Freeman is far too concerned with the author's hard work and hurt feelings. Why is his criteria for prolonged attention the hard work of the author anyway? Plenty of terrible, worthless books are the result of equal 'hard work'.
I'm not making a case for or against Tree of Smoke, mind you. I just don't think it should matter to a critic (nevermind the NBCC president) how long the novel took to write.
Posted by: Daniel | May 08, 2008 at 12:47 PM