Our friends in the UK are fretting over the westward exodus of literary archives ... If the words "Literary Brooklyn" don't already set you running for the hills, Brooklyn Was Mine might be for you ... Our plans for our masterwork, Lassie Goes To Brooklyn, Rents An Expensive Small Aparment, Starts a Self-Important Literary Journal and Sells a Tedious Debut Novel, have been thwarted - the copyright appears headed back to her creator's daughter .... Ha Jin discusses his most memorable summer, which includes leaving his family behind to come here (ours, on the other hand, mostly features Pinky Tuscadero) ... One of the judges takes you inside the Samuel Johnson short list ... FOTEV Jack Pendarvis talks about his new novel, Awesome, in the Daily Mississippian ... We're definitely with Ross Raisin, who has been nominated for the lucrative Dylan Thomas Prize - waiting beats writing, because, you know, there's tips ... The blog v. critics thing continues, like some stubborn zombie, though to hear Jay Rayner tell it, "The problem with such arguments is that they risk becoming terribly binary: you are either for the critics or for the bloggers; happily the responses from both sides in this debate are more complex than that." Presumably because Schickel and Birkerts have been banned ... Small talk with Siri Hustvedt ... The battle that reshaped children's literature (no, it's nothing to do with Harry Potter) ... Maps and Legends appeared to fly a bit under the radar down here (which is a shame) but Canada, at least, is talking notice ... We miss no opportunity to link to David Markson news ... No three words get us hotter faster than "literary agents fight" (except, perhaps, for "Attention K-mart shoppers") ... A full set of chapters of "the world's oldest surviving full-length novel" has been discovered in Tokyo ... Patrick McGrath, profiled in the Guardian ... Another literary landmark facing extinction ... Ian McEwan, in his own words, on his long lost brother ... And, finally, we really do feel for Tom Stoppard. Seriously. We're right there with you, Sir Tom. But please don't sit it out for too long, eh?

I always find it amazing -- and somewhat unsettling -- that in the blog vs. critics (or old school vs. new school, or print vs. new media, etc.) debate everyone seems to feel that one can either swing to one side or the other. That a love for the old way of doing things and an investment in the new are mutually exclusive. (See: Buzz Bissinger/Will Leitch flare-up that took over the sports blogging world in recent months.)
In the case of Sven Birkerts, who Mark mentioned as someone who presumably has nothing worthwhile to say on the subject, I find it hard to imagine that anybody who truly loves reading and books would be unable to identify with some of Birkerts' concerns, whether or not that person agrees with all of his' assertions. In "The Gutenberg Elegies," Birkerts' much beloved and much reviled book on reading and new technology (now some fifteen years old), what shines, for me, is the author's deep appreciation for literature and the way he so coherently and intelligently details what it is about fiction that has made his life a fuller, more lively place than it would've been without it.
Were some of his arguments short-sighted or, even, alarmist? Perhaps. But one need not ignore everything worthwhile the man has to offer because of certain opinions one might not agree with. (Case in point: I consider "The Gutenberg Elegies" an all-time favorite, and am at the same time an every day visitor to this here site.)
As the New Yorker noted: "Birkerts on reading fiction is like M.F.K. Fisher on eating and Norman Maclean on fly casting. He makes you want to go do it." A rare critic, he who inspires in his reader that kind of enthusiasm for the written word.
Posted by: AJG | July 15, 2008 at 09:41 AM
I get the impression that critics who write for the print media haven't read many blogs, so they imagine blogs as doing in an amateurish way what they do professionally. But a blogger can write about books in a way that would be impossible in print - think of Language Hat (www.languagehat.com), who reads books in Russian, Arabic and other languages, quotes them in the original language so readers can see what he's talking about, and then discusses points of literary, historical and linguistic interest. Commenters on the blog are often able to elucidate points that are unclear. It's understandable that newspapers and magazines don't do this, but a cause for celebration that blogs can.
The print media seem, as far as I can tell, to aim for the appearance of ideological neutrality, but it's often enlightening to read a writer who spells out the ideological underpinnings both of his or her own analysis and those of the positions criticised. For me, anyway, blogs like Owen Hatherley's Sit Down Man You're a Bloody Tragedy at http://nastybrutalistandshort.blogspot.com (architectural criticism, music, much more) and Infinite Thought at http://www.cinestatic.com/infinitethought/ (philosophy, cinema, education, much more) offer the critical equivalent of Geertz's thick description of a culture. It would be silly to blame a critic with an assignment and a word count for failing to offer this, but we're lucky to have it.
Posted by: Helen DeWitt | July 15, 2008 at 11:49 AM
Am actually in the middle of Maps and Legends right now and am madly impressed. Man is smart as hell and not full of himself like some other successful male novelists we could talk about. Rec'd.
Posted by: Kati | July 15, 2008 at 03:56 PM
Stop manhattanization of Brooklyn, whatever. My group is better than that. My group proposes to change the name of Brooklyn by permanently dropping the "R" because Brooklyn is so damn book smart it should just be called Booklyn. And Booklyn is just neater, right? And more catchy. And, with a new name like that, we'll draw the type of hype-ishy attention to ourselves that we deserve. And we'll get more time to write because we won't have to fill out the R on address forms. Nobody here says the R any damn way! And all those who don't want it changed and still want to physically live in Brooklyn can move to coney island because we will keep the "R" there just for old time sake. gotta have nostalgia, ya know.
Posted by: Jerry Sticker | July 15, 2008 at 09:50 PM
I love your blog, but hate the format of your marginalia... Large, unbroken blocks of text are so hard to read online! I would love bullets or such... Just a suggestion! :)
Posted by: Kristen (bookclubclassics) | July 17, 2008 at 05:20 PM