* The film Defiance has brought new attention to Nechama Tec's book upon which it is based. (We don't, however, go to Edward Zwick movies on principle, so you'll have to let us know what you think of this one.)
* Although we're wary of any article that includes the words "this Internet thing" in its lede, the saga of 93-year-old Betty X. Davis - a writer still waiting for her break, and "determined that she will write until she can't" - should be instructive to the whining classes.
* Neil Gaiman has won the Newberry Medal.
* Signs of the times: Sara Nelson has been laid off from Publishers Weekly.
* The Telegraph remembers Inger Christensen.
Considered the foremost experimentalist of her generation, Inger Christensen took as her central theme the space between language and experience, reality and words. "I have attempted to tell about a world that does not exist in order to make it exist," she said.
* The Iowa Writers' Workshop gets a nod from The Simpsons.
* Robert McCrum anoints his three modern greats: W.G. Sebald, Zadie Smith and Ted Hughes.
* The Washington Post looks at Rogert Lathbury's Orchises Press.
Even as the publishing industry's titans in Manhattan reel from layoffs and discouraging retail sales, Lathbury's 25-year-old firm, Orchises Press, based in his home's atticlike fourth floor, keeps ambling along, producing about three books a year, always on Jan. 27 in honor of his beloved aunt's birthday. This week, Orchises -- which Lathbury named after an orchid in a Robert Frost poem -- will publish two poetry books, including one about terrorism and torture by George Witte, the editor in chief of St. Martin's Press.
* "What does 'literary president' mean, exactly?"
* The Baltimore Sun wonders if you read just one book at a time. So do we. For the record, we're always working through several at a time and, with research for the new novel, that number is even higher right now. At the moment, we count seven books in progress, three novels, the others non-fiction, although it should be noted that we probably don't get through them any faster than if we simply read them consecutively, so, really, why bother?. Et vous, cher lecteur?
* Bookstores of the East Village.
* Susan Catto provides a list of four authors as Jane Austen alternatives for fans looking for something different.
They can look to the writers whose books were beloved by Jane Austen herself, the early women novelists who laid the groundwork, both stylistically and socially, for Austen's achievement. These 18th-century authors were blending satire and sentiment before Austen ever put pen to paper, and their personal lives - invariably more dramatic than Austen's - would appear positively racy if given the Hollywood treatment.
* The Columbia Journalism Review has launched Page Views, a blog about books, and the first post is a worthwhile Q&A with David Denby conducted by James Marcus. (Denby will be in L.A. on February 3, if you want to ask him about this snark business.)
* And, finally, go check out Yaddocast: "Twenty unique episodes exploring the history, culture, and artistic achievements of Yaddo and its guest residents, from Yaddo's founding to today. Each episode is an eight to fifteen minute examination of the life and work of one Yaddo founder or artist. Taken together, this series presents over 2 1/2 hours of stories and commentary ... "


I'm usually reading a few books at a time. Usually one non-fiction of some sort and one poetry title.
Posted by: Daniel E. Pritchard | January 27, 2009 at 06:20 AM
Hurray for Neil Gaiman!
Adults will fall in love with this book too.
Mark, I've always got several books going.
Posted by: denise hamilton | January 27, 2009 at 07:43 AM
My reading is separated into "day books" and "night books." At night, before bed, I read mysteries to escape the day's travails, but during the day I read "serious' books, usually one nonfiction and one novel.
Posted by: Stan Izen | January 27, 2009 at 07:52 AM
I usually have multiple books going -- at least one at home and one that can fit in my briefcase.
Separately: news just came across that John Updike died.
Posted by: Don | January 27, 2009 at 10:31 AM
Okay, I'll bite: Why don't you go to Edward Zwick films on principle? He's made some good stuff, and some duds, but for the life of me I can't see why he would spark that reaction.
Posted by: David Kurapka | January 27, 2009 at 10:35 AM
Hey David, obviously, things like films and filmmakers are purely a matter of personal preference, so I don't claim anything empirical about my judgment here, but I have always found Zwick to be heavy-handed beyond belief. I think his stuff is broad, mawkish, predictable and unsubtle. I suppose if you grade him on the curve of "Hollywood entertainments," he's a reasonably competent filmmaker but I find his stuff undigestible for its shallowness and easy manipulation. BUT - as ever - this is purely one man's opinion. (I think I finally gave up on him for making Jennifer Connelly look so lifeless in Blood Diamond.)
Posted by: TEV | January 27, 2009 at 10:57 AM
Currently reading: Richard Lange's "Dead Boys", "Best American Short Stories 2008", Per Petterson's "Out Stealing Horses," Bill Bryson's "The Mother Tongue," and Keating's "History of Ireland." Too much, and perhaps the explanation for why I I read so slowly.
Posted by: Carl | January 27, 2009 at 06:53 PM
20+ at a time (a habit I've been trying to break for years now.)
Code: the Hidden Language of Computer Hardware and Software
Spycraft: The Secret History of the CIA's Spytechs
Tinkers, by Paul Harding
Number9Dream, by David Mitchell
Religion and the Decline of Magic, by Keith Thomas
Loving, by Henry Green
The Gift, by Lewis Hyde
Art as Experience, by John Dewey
and on and on....
Posted by: Antoine Wilson | January 28, 2009 at 10:00 AM
As a screenwriter friend put it, I "stream" books...novels and short stories in bed, and non-fiction at most other times.
This brings up a really fascinating bit of history dug up by Newsweek...the idea of "two sleeps," which is highly conducive to reading.
If you wake up in the middle of the night and stay up for an hour or two, you may not be an insomniac...only normal.
Google "Five Myths about Insomnia" for more.
Posted by: Kit Stolz | February 02, 2009 at 02:16 PM
It's 'Roger' Lathbury.
Posted by: Ananya | February 09, 2009 at 11:56 AM