Russia continues to display its firm grasp of artistic freedom, as a federal district court forces a journalist to pay a $1,000 fine for writing a negative book review.
The plaintiff, an author whose work of fiction was reviewed in the publication's book review section, sued the reviewer, claiming that the author and his family had experienced severe mental suffering and that his professional reputation was damaged as a result of the review. The writer stated that after reading the book review, he experienced chest pains, headache, and elevated blood pressure. He demanded to be compensated in the amount of US$150,000.
Hmm. Then again. Maybe there's something to this. Whom do we sue for the boredom and misery inflicted by all these years of reading merely illiterate reviews?


tishe edesh', dal'she budesh'.
word.
Posted by: Niall | May 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM
The author who sued the newspaper is obviously "well connected," and suing the reviewers does seem wrong. Yet, I find it interesting that Peter Roudik on the website of the Library of Congress failed to translate the quote from the review that appears in the Russian news source. The review in question was entitled "Half-baked pancake and half-eaten grandmother" and claimed that the author "invented a new genre of poop throwing." Among other things. Just FYI.
Posted by: Olga Zilberbourg | May 13, 2009 at 12:16 PM
This bitty:
"Some have even suggested that if a book reviewer can be sued, a reader who did not like a book can sue the author for making a bad quality product."
... sounds like one to throw into the pool of ideas for Fixing The Publishing Industry.
Posted by: Miette | May 13, 2009 at 02:48 PM
Please correct BOZHE (not Bohze)!
Posted by: helena | May 13, 2009 at 06:28 PM
Done - thanks, Helena.
Posted by: TEV | May 13, 2009 at 06:59 PM