Yeah, seriously.
So, since Maud Newton was kind enough to run with my Banville ball, I decided to link to this essay about Banville's The Newton Letter I'd read some months ago. Sadly, I found it was no longer online, but thanks to Google's cache I was able to grab a copy. It's rather long but I found it fascinating, especially if you know Goethe's Elective Affinities.
Ok ... here goes:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ingo Berensmeyer
University of Siegen
The Crisis of Modernity and the Postmodern Interlude:
John Banville's The Newton Letter
The Newton Letter, An Interlude (1982) is the third part of a tetralogy of novels by Irish writer John Banville (1945–) tracing historical configurations of emerging worldpictures from early modernity to the present. It follows two more immediately historical novels, Doctor Copernicus (1976) and Kepler (1981), and precedes Mefisto (1986), which deals with the contemporary paradigm shift of chaos theory. The tetralogy must not be mistaken for a mere illustration of scientific problems and paradigm changes; it is not simply 'about' the crisis of Western rationality, nor is it out to support supposedly well-proven arguments about science being, for example, "one Wittgensteinian language game among many" (Lernout 1988, 74). Its focus of interest is not primarily on epistemology, but on issues of – for want of a better word – anthropology, in the sense that science, art, and other cultural practices are regarded as 'life forms' ( Lebensformen, cf. Spranger [1914] 1950).
The Newton Letter is an 'interlude' in more than the obvious sense that it mediates between the historical and contemporary sections of a tetralogy of novels. Situated between history and contemporaneity, between postmodernism and its as yet nameless beyond – its position reminiscent of Hermann Broch's "noch nicht und doch schon" ('not yet and yet already') in The Death of Virgil – , it is a turning point in Banville's œuvre and may be said to contain in nuce or en abyme the totality of his endeavours, and a self-parody to boot. Unlike the two previous novels, it does not attempt to present a biographical-historical picture of an eminent scientist; quite on the contrary, its theme is the failure of just such an attempt, and this failure is presented in an ironic mode. As far as the satirical, ironic tone of its writer-narrator is concerned, The Newton Letter is rooted in the Beckettian tradition, and it shares with Beckett certain points of departure: a negation of the possibility of representing 'reality' in writing and a radical questioning of "the very possibility of the historical imagining" (Brown 1991, 169); yet in its reinvestigation of the modern(ist) crisis of art and science it moves – almost despite itself – away from Beckett to develop into an exploration of the possibilities of writing at the contemporary moment.