The Christian Science Monitor weighs in with a lengthy piece of the state of literary theory. We've already seen a few pieces like this, and I suspect we'll only see more.
Postmodern literary theory is now transforming itself so rapidly that Marxist, feminist, deconstructionist, and psychoanalytic critics (and others) are flocking back to the drawing board in droves as they search for new approaches to writing and teaching.Indeed, some academics say that postmodern theory is on the way out altogether and that the heady ideas that once changed the way literature is taught and read will soon be as extinct as the dodo and the buggy whip.
There's a lot of interesting food for thought here. In light of my recent post on the NYTBR state of affairs, I'm left wondering if this may not point the way to some overall necessary realignment of literary purpose. I have no personal beef with postmodernism - I actually find much of it stimulating and useful - but I'm also aware of its alienating role in unmooring literature from any sense of the essential. As you've already seen here, it's a problem that fascinates me.
In unrelated news, the Monitor also rounds up the NBCC nominees.
Comments