We are not going to pretend for one second that we've read this very long piece about Niall Ferguson yet but we link to it anyway because (a) it looks interesting as hell (we've printed it and will read it later in the bathroom) and (b) Ferguson's a fascinating guy, controversial since he hit the history scene. (Is there actually a history scene, one wonders.) We think he's often just aiming to be provocative but what's wrong with that. We do pretty much the same thing here.
At only just over 40 years old, Niall Ferguson has been named as one of Britain’s 100 most important public intellectuals by Prospect magazine, and even more notably, as one of the world's 100 most influential people by Time. After a glittering undergraduate and postgraduate career at Oxford University and several years teaching there, he soon achieved a repertory of prestigious posts worthy of some particularly well-connected medieval bishop.For a time, he was simultaneously professor of political and financial history in Oxford, professor of economics at New York University, and senior fellow of the Hoover institution at Stanford. New York became his main base at the start of 2003, and in summer 2004 he is taking up a history professorship at Harvard.
Within weeks of arriving in the United States, Ferguson also found himself shuttling to Washington on government invitation, fraternising with policymakers from Colin Powell downwards. His existing profile as a pugnacious reviewer, columnist and TV pundit in London newspapers and on the BBC was rapidly complemented by the appearance of comparable ubiquity in the US news media.
Besides, if he acts up too much, he knows Stanley Crouch is gonna come slap his McFace.
Comments