... but we're reasonably certain "oozing" is a verb. (Blurb courtesy Publishers Lunch)
Verbless in Paris Also from France, the WSJ shines a light on a new novel from Michel Dansel, THE TRAIN TO NOWHERE, notable for presenting 233 pages without a single verb. "A typical passage: 'In that carriage, between the grumpy woman oozing vulgarity and the similarly asinine creature with her, the progenitor and her eczematous brat, the purple-faced fatso, the half-bald guy like a vegetarian may-bug, the verbose matinee idol and the crazy witch, no room for me.'"
And to all you lovely well-wishers out there (and you know who you are), you warm this blogger's cold, black heart.
Reading, wondering, thinking...
Posted by: Mary | July 16, 2004 at 04:27 PM
Oozing by itself is definately a verb... but in this case, I suppose one could argue that its use here is as part of a present participle phrase, seeing as how it's part of a clause intended to describe the grumpy woman. Even though such phrases contain verbs, they are treated as though they are adjectives, because they're used to describe another noun. Of course, in a normal sentence this would be more clear, since there'd be another verb in there.
Then again, I'm no grammar expert. I probably would have chickened out and used "vulgarity-oozing", since you could make a better case for that being an adjective.
Posted by: rasputin | July 17, 2004 at 04:24 AM