Ruth Barnhouse had been Sylvia Plath’s psychiatrist since her hospitalization at McLean in 1953, a period in her life immortalized in her semi-autobiographical novel, "The Bell Jar." But what most Plath observers don’t realize is just how close Barnhouse remained with Plath after she left McLean, and even after she left the country for her final ill-fated move to England with husband Ted Hughes. Plath biographer Paul Alexander is one exception. In an article for The Nation he wrote, “As I’d expected, she (Ruth Barnhouse) was a singular figure in Plath’s life….From September 1953 until February 1963 Barnhouse and Plath stayed in more or less constant contact either by mail or by telephone. During those years Plath wrote Barnhouse long, revealing letters.”
Fascinated by "The Bell Jar" as an adolescent, I was part of a generation of women who felt that Sylvia Plath spoke to our desire to balance our personal ambition with close relationships, and the intense internal conflicts that produced. And as a psychoanalytic psychologist, I've written a great deal about the relationship between therapist and patient. So after having been left unsatisfied by all of the Plath biographies, I wanted to know more about what happened, and didn't happen, in Sylvia's treatment. I was primarily interested in why she did not remain in the treatment she so badly needed, yet could not give up her relationship with her psychiatrist. Had Ruth Barnhouse tried to keep Sylvia Plath in therapy, but was unable to?
I'm curious about her relationship as well. Thanks for the tip on the article.
Posted by: angela | November 30, 2004 at 01:52 PM