A few prefatory thoughts before this week's installment. Some of our recent email on this feature suggests we need to reiterate this point: This is an entirely subjective, arbitrary and sometimes even irrational feature. It's also motivated by some of our pet concerns - i.e., literary fiction - and peeves - see below - and should be taken with the proverbial grain of salt since we're basically more or less the cranky assholes we've been accused of being. We leads to point two: Although we do harbor some ongoing bitterness toward the LAT for a variety of reasons - a draconian registration policy, a tone deafness about the world of litblogs, its constant toadying to Hollywood - the fact is we're actually rooting for them each time we open up the Sunday paper. We want to be enthralled, we want to be excited. It just seldom works out that way. Now, on to the Thumbnail® ...
STATS
Full length fiction reviews: 4 (plus First Fiction column)
Full length non-fiction reviews: 2 (plus Discoveries column)
Special material: Guest essay on Guillermo Cabrera Infante.
Noted: The back page, recently given over to reviews, was a full page ad this week. And why has LAT never bothered with a Table of Contents? You'd save us some flipping around there, Steve-o. Think about it.
TITLES, AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
Serafina's Stories and Jemez Spring by Rudolfo Anaya. Reviewed by Jonathan Kirsch Grade: B+
Little, Women, Little Men and Jo's Boys by Louisa May Alcott. Reviewed by Katharine Weber Grade: B
March by Geraldine Brooks. Reviewed by Heller McAlpin. Grade: A
A Changed Man by Francine Prose. Reviewed by Richard Eder. Grade: B+
They Made America by Harold Evans with Gail Buckland and David Lefer. Reviewed by M.G. Lord. Grade: C
Without a Net by Michelle Kennedy. Reviewed by Merle Rubin. Grade: C-
Big Bang by Simon Singh. Reviewed by Lawrence M. Krauss. Grade: A
Essay: No silencing a boom voice by Nivia Montengro. Grade: A
First Fiction Column: Please Don't Come Back from the Moon by Dean Bakopoulos; and Stop That Girl by Elizabeth McKeznie. Reviewed by James Marcus Grade: A
Discoveries Column: The Midnight Disease by Alice W. Flaherty; In Fond Remembrance of Me by Howard Norman; and Suburban Safari by Hannah Holmes. Reviewed by Susan Salter Reynolds. Grade: B-
WHAT WE LIKE ...
As the individual grades suggest, there's a whole lot to like this week, proving more or less conclusively that when LAT isn't fawning over celebs, it can hand in some notable literary coverage ... Obviously, we like to 2-1 ratio favoring fiction this time around, and there's much that's specifically worth noting ... It does seem like we're handing out "A"s with abandon, but we were taken with McAlpin's review which manages to make the book sound interesting while avoiding the tired Opening Statement/Plot Summary/Critical Paragraph review paradigm ... We also enjoyed the review of the Singh book, one of those odd non-fiction titles we find ourselves excited to check out ... The essay on Cuban writer Infante was well-written, informative and a worthy world-class addition to the Book Review ... and both books in the First Fiction column struck us as well-chosen ... Even the lesser graded reviews are worth your while ... We're pleased to see the Anaya books reviewed, even if the thriller doesn't really turn us on ... Weber's look at the Alcott reissues is a serious piece of work that would have been graded higher if it didn't wait to mention the editions under review until the penulimate paragraph ... And even if the closing graf of the Eder review struck us as overstated ("few besides George Bernard Shaw, with his undeserving poor, have managed such a stinging voice from below"), any review that sends us to our OED (to look up "borborygmic"*) is OK by us ...
WHAT WE DON'T ...
We're not wild about two of the non-fiction reviews ... we're into pet peeve land here but reviewers who use "I" throughout their reviewers strike us as overly subjective and not terribly rigorous with their scholarship, and the "I"s that dot the Lord review may be of interest to the author but leave us cold (we're not that excited about what "fascinated" Lord) ... The Rubin review is actually a good deal worse. Rubin's expectations for the title clearly were not met but given everything the review describes, we have no idea how or why one would expect the author to tackle "the larger socio-economic conditions that made her so vulnerable: low wages, high rents and astronomically high housing prices ... " Um, maybe because she's not, like, ya know, a fuckin' sociologist? Going out on a limb here ... Still, overall the problems in this surprisingly strong issue feel like quibbles.
GRADE: B+ Maybe we've just taken a stronger dose of our happy pills, but this is as strong an issue as we can remember, its minor infelicities notwithstanding. Ed, why don't you send that brownie to Wasserman's office this week?
* Pay attention, DFW, to the correct use of a footnote:
now that's a great word.
Posted by: genevieve | March 07, 2005 at 09:47 PM