L.A. Observed continues its coverage of Steve Wasserman's departure from the L.A. Times Book Review, linking to this item by Steve Zeitchik in PW:
Sources say Wasserman actually officially resigned some time ago but had agreed to stay on through the paper's Festival of Books, which took place the weekend before last. Insiders point to a new management structure that was instituted last fall and changes that resulted from the Tribune Company buying the newspaper as factors that contributed to Wasserman's unhappiness. Rutten, who emphasized the choice "was entirely Steve's," called Wasserman's tenure "remarkable" and cautioned against taking for granted many of the changes he said Wasserman brought to the paper, primarily his introduction of more serious essays on serious books.
Since learning of Wasserman's departure, the paper has been interviewing internal and external candidates, according to Rutten, who added that "There's probably never been a time in the history of the paper when the masthead of the paper were as committed to book reviewing, to book coverage, and all that goes with it." Rutten said many of Wasserman's changes would continue. "I don't think one should expect to see any of the strengths of the current review--which are considerable--frittered away."
Oh, please. Fritter at will. Insiders also posit that SW is considering a new career as a literary agent ... then, at least, the white suit will start to make some sense.
Comments