Well, we're making progress, however slight but there's still a huge amount of work demanding our attention around Chez TEV, not the least of which includes organizing our final thoughts and the next crop of Litblog Co-op nominees. So, once again, we toss out links somewhat melange-like though we'll pop in and out during the day, internet connections permitting.
* Although we'll probably annoy some friends, we can't help but notice that every time Rick Moody takes to the press these days, it's for some defensive purpose or another. First was his recent Believer piece about how the nasty press couldn't leave the NBA awards. Now there's this piece in the Guardian about his band ... yes, his band. The author doth protest too much.
* Scott Martelle turns in a nice profile on Jonathan Kozol for the LA Times.
* The reviews of J.M. Coetzee's Slow Man are starting to trickle in. Writing for the Village Voice, Benjamin Strong says "it confronts by analogy [Coetzee's] own predicament ... "
... that of the obsolete dissident. Until recently, the problem for Coetzee, born in Cape Town in 1940 of English and Dutch extraction, had been how to write honestly as a white man about apartheid. A former computer scientist, analytical by default, he never flinched (in his studies of colonial literature and censorship) at placing his own ancestors' history under the gaze of his microscope.
* Amos Oz has received the Goethe Prize.
* Scott Rudin has acquired the film rights for Benjamin Kunkel's Indecision.
* The new interviews posted over at Loggernaut include talks with Daniel Alarcon and James Longenbach.
* [NOTE - OBNOXIOUS POP UPS ALERT] John LeCarre is one of the names being considered for the new James Bond novel.
* Shalimar the Clown (which finallly showed up here this week) is reviewed in Time Asia.
* Tasmanian author and poet Margaret Scott has died.
* The Boston Globe looks at a title we've been eyeing hungrily in our TBR pile, Robert Dessaix' Twilight of Love, which "seeks to confront timeless concerns -- love, aging, mortality -- through the prism of Turgenev's life and writings."
More later. Or not. We're kinda capricious that way.
The article on Kozol was interesting, though I suspect they soft-pedaled it. I interviewed Kozol last year at this time and his quotes where very direct and challenging, you might say radical:
"Brown [vs. Board of Education] is off the table. They're not even asking for separate but equal. They are asking for less than Plessy v. Ferguson. In this case, public policy in education has gone back more than 100 years."
"It can't be changed by blue-ribbon panels," he says. "It's not going to come from fiddling with state finance formulas. It's not going to come from more bluster from the White House.
"The problem here, is that what is adequate for the poor is always going to be determined by the representatives of the rich. History has proven that they [the rich] will never define adequate for the poor in a way to make them competitive with their own children.
The only solution, he told me, is "a political movement, a sweeping upsurge in moral consciousness from young people in this country. It's going to take passionate determination from the children of the privileged. Theirs is a tarnished victory. They know they couldn't have won it if the game was fair ... It's the uncomfortable little secret we all live with."
Posted by: joe miller | August 30, 2005 at 06:13 AM
Good on you for noting the passing of Scott - she was the only poet we've ever had appear on a weekly TV variety show as a guest.
Posted by: genevieve | September 01, 2005 at 12:15 AM