Stuff has piled up with astonishing rapidity as we were sequestered away, typing furiously. We share the best of it with you now before getting our heads back down to work:
* Michiko has spoken - On Beauty is "glorious."
* The Christian "We're Too Delicate To Say BOOKSLUT" Science Monitor looks at Jane Smiley's paean to the novel, Thirteen Ways of Looking at the Novel.
* Looks like Tom Wolfe had so much fun hanging out with college students that he's going back again.
* The Verminator speaks!! Our very own Jim Ruland is the latest LAist interview subject. (And speaking of Ruland, it's an all-Ruland weekend in LA, with Vermin returning this Saturday, and a reading of Hobart magazine contributors - Jim among them - Friday night. Details in the next day or two.)
* The latest OED News is online and includes an appeal for background on "chat-up" ... We can definitely help with that one ...
* Margaret Atwood inaugurated the 7th Reykjavík International Literature Festival Sunday night.
* Novelists are rushing to Orhan Pamuk's defense.
* Rick Moody's latest gets a kind word from the Boston Globe.
* Brave the annoying pop ups for an interview with Liev Schreiber about the film adaptation of Everything is Illuminated. (The NuWilshire theatre around the corner from home sports the rather dismal one-sheet.)
* The great American novel - MIA.
* The ever lovely Laila Lalami reviews Shalimar the Clown for The Oregonian and finds it "ingenious and beautiful." She also has a long and deeply intelligent review of Desertion up at The Nation.
* If you want another glimpse of the style of incoming LATBR editor David Ulin, check out his profile of Kurt Vonnegut (scroll down to find it).
* Robert Birnbaum sits down with Frederick Busch, and the two chat about "his sunny disposition, writing poetry, the protagonist in North, Bark Magazine, Jack’s nameless dog, the possibility of another Jack book, fear of imagination, Ed Champion’s brownie watch, Charles Baxter’s Burning "Down the House" and dysfunctional narrative, Deep Throat, Jill Bialosky, Gore Vidal, James Wood, Stephen King, Phillip Levine, Robert Stone, the 4 greatest Hollywood novels, what’s next for him and baseball—among other things"
* PW advises us that the October Harper's includes Round One of a potential Ben Marcus/J-Franz dust up. An excerpt:
The piece is ironically headlined "Why Experimental Fiction Threatens to Destroy Publishing, Jonathan Franzen and Life As We Know It," with "A Correction" as the allusive subtitle." It will be published at the end of September. A Harper's source described the pieces as Marcus being "troubled by the fact that Franzen is now using his position as pundit to discredit the literary style that failed him." Franzen's first two novels, Strong Motion and The Twenty-Seventh City, included elements of experimental fiction and, according to Marcus, didn't work very well as novels. The piece argues that Franzen turned to The Corrections (which Marcus likes, by the way) because Franzen couldn't do more challenging styles very well and, Marcus implies, because he craved fame.
(Thanks to Dan Wickett for the heads up.)
* And finally, we're certainly pleased for Benjamin Kunkel for the attention Indecision has been getting, and for the successes of n+1 (which we generally like) but are we the only ones who found his terrorism essay a long-winded bore? Why has no one called out this earnest term paper for being eye-glazingly dull, long on recapitulation and short on insight? Does the white-hot glare of success mean editorial standards are given a holiday?
"ever lovely Laila Lalami" is just plain fun to say
Posted by: tito | September 13, 2005 at 12:36 PM
Well, I called out the Kunkel essay for being a bore, but I was home alone and nobody heard me ;)
Posted by: SKL | September 13, 2005 at 03:42 PM
The Marcus piece is amazing. Inspiring. Franzen, who? It's language ... the way Marcus talks about it ... yeah.
Posted by: danyel | September 25, 2005 at 04:21 PM