Well, based on the comments and emails we got yesterday, you'd think the biggest Booker Prize story of the day was "Sarvas Can't Spell Guinness" ... But there's a considerably wider collection of views and reviews out there, so to round up some of the highlights:
The Irish Times - the hometown newspaper of John Banville - reports on the nomination:
Banville (59) has been shortlisted for The Sea, in which the narrator, an ageing man, humorously conscious of his physical decline, looks back on his life and in particular recalls his childhood summers spent in an Irish coastal town. This is a significant shortlisting for Banville. Although he has an international reputation and is consistently well-reviewed in Britain, he has only once been previously shortlisted. The Sea marks something of a departure for him as it is less overtly intellectual and far more personal. The familiar laconic voice and irony are present, yet so too is a fresh, more human tone of regret.
Banville's previous shortlist was for The Book of Evidence. He was also longlisted for Shroud.
Like others, the Scotsman expresses surprise at the elimination of Rushdie and McEwan ... The Times UK deems the shortlist an "intellectual climax" (who sleeps in the wet spot?) and a "snub to some literary lions" ... Reuters deems it a "shock literary list" ... The BBC offers brief profiles of the contenders ... even Manchester Online weighs in.
UPDATE: The Times Online looks at The Sea's displacement of Saturday, a bit ironic given Banville's controversial review and its response.
So, where's that Banville interview, eh?
Posted by: John Shannon | September 10, 2005 at 10:07 AM