The Village Voice courageously reprints its wrong-headed 1958 review of Lolita in honor of its 50th anniversary
All writing begins somewhere on a scale streching from Farthest Inside to Farthest Outside. Vladimir Nabokov's widely heralded "Lolita" is the outsidest, most artificial book I've read in years. To its admirers, that may be its spendor. I want something else in novels. .
I don't know if I would call this review "wrong-headed." Even though Lolita is now a widely respected canonical work, it doesn't mean that people aren't entitled to have their own opinions about it. There are many works in the canon that I personally don't like. It doesn't mean that the canon is "right" and I am "wrong." Just like the Village Voice isn't necessarily "wrong" in its assessment of Lolita. (And in fact, many people I've talked to have said that although they found the language in Lolita beautiful, the subject matter--pedophilia--ultimately ruined their enjoyment of the novel.)
Posted by: Michelle | October 27, 2005 at 07:56 AM
Certainly everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I find it rather unsettling, however, when people are unable to divorce the subject matter from the author, or refuse to accept the work because it offends their idea of what is moral.
Posted by: Therese | January 28, 2006 at 06:22 PM
I have to support Therese, especially if we are to read that Nabokovs intention was not to make pedophilia more acceptable, but to indict the American obsession with youth. Especially, because that obsession continues, has deepened and has infected more and more countries ...
Also, Village Voice does not criticize the pedophilia factor at all! This is all in your little head ... ;)
Besides people not being able to separate the content from the author, It is sad that people cannot grasp the practical joke herein.
It would be blatantly ridiculous for me to distill some advocacy of large-scale whale hunting from Moby Dick. Just the same, it is silly to get all worked up about Lolita because of the relationship between the older man and the younger girl, since nowhere it is clearly stated what the nature is of this relationship. He tricked the General Public, and they fell for it wholesale. Including our Michelle ...
Posted by: brian patricks | January 02, 2007 at 07:20 PM