Cranky Norman Lebrecht says something only barely comprehensible about writers and the Holocaust, the gist seeming to be something about being against unseemly profiting (which we're certainly down with) but apparently making exceptions for his own unseemly soapboxing. Or something like that. Really, once you read this, you'll see this is the best we could do.
Exploitation lies at the heart of Everything is Illuminated, book and film alike. Making what is essentially an entertainment, a evening's diversion, about a massacre of many innocents is not to be lightly undertaken. It requires more than just an eye for a good story or even a second-generation family connection. Author, film-maker or any other artist must think long and hard about motive before dabbling in dimensions of misery that defy imagination and are more than adequately chronicled by expert historians. There must be a credible justification, a reason that can be given before the courts of conscience, before an author sits down and makes a fine living out of other people's suffering.
Lawrence Langer says it better. So does Adorno, for that matter.
Thanks for the Langer link. I've read a lot on the Holocaust, but this was philosophically worthwhile (and so little is.)
Posted by: John Shannon | November 22, 2005 at 11:25 AM
But then there's Gass, who rightly notes that without the great accounts, which may or may not be historical, but which will be coated with the sorts of narratives that best suit fiction, the Holocaust will be forgotten as other devestations have been forgotten. So we need all our accountants.
Posted by: Vanessa Place | November 24, 2005 at 06:05 AM