The Los Angeles Times interviews literary luddite John Updike.*
John Updike's novels are not traditionally illuminated — or inspired — by breaking news. But as he spoke Sunday about his newest work, the author couldn't help but point out the parallels between "Terrorist" and the arrest of 17 alleged terrorists in Canada the day before. In the book and real life, groups planned to carry out deadly attacks with 3 tons of ammonium nitrate, more than the amount Timothy McVeigh used to blow up the federal building in Oklahoma City.
Test your Updike knowledge and win his books. (Although it begs the question if you know enough to answer these questions, then don't you presumably have the books already?)
* Maybe we're just crankier than usual but Updike really irritated us with his BEA foolishness and the imitators it's spawned since. Not that we're necessarily any more receptive to the New York Times Magazine's cover story on digital books. Why must the dialogue always be characterized by extremes? Is it possible there's a future in which neither the book is dead, nor the digital world all-encompassing but perhaps the two merely complement one another? Although, understandably, staking out such moderate positions gets you neither prime time speaking slots nor magazine covers.
Mark -- I was also disappointed by Updike's anti-internet rant, but perhaps we can excuse this on the account of the guy's age. When I'm in my 70's, I'll probably complain about whatever new gadgets everybody's raving about too. The internet is more than a new gadget (and it's also hardly new, in 2006) but I guess I can forgive John Updike for not understanding this.
Posted by: Levi | June 06, 2006 at 07:29 AM
Like I said, I was probably just being crankier than usual. But it is such a sad cliche - the old guy resisting technology. Tom Wolfe might be a terrible hack but at least he goes to keggers ...
Posted by: TEV | June 06, 2006 at 09:51 AM
Remember the critical duels with Gore Vidal and John Gardner. :)
Posted by: Charlie Karpowsky | June 20, 2006 at 08:21 AM