James Wood holds forth brilliantly (surprise, surprise) on Peter Carey's splendid novel Theft, which we've noted with admiration.
The jovial cynicism of Theft, and its poststructuralist scepticism about the necessary presence of the author in a work of art, seem rather easy achievements for Carey, not least because he dealt with them so nimbly in My Life as a Fake. As in that book, the real subject – Carey’s abiding subject, addressed in novel after novel – is the hoax of Australian identity, and its self-tortured relationship with the rest of the world.
Wood judiciously sidesteps the controversy surrounding the work focusing on, as ever, the work itself. We've also been struck by Carey's ongoing themes of authenticity, fakery and identity, and we were pleased to see Wood's reference to Frankenstein but thought that point might have been taken deeper. It does seem, especially when comparing My Life as a Fake and Theft that Carey is suggesting that unleashing a fake on the world brings something to life, however unintended, and something that must be reckoned with. It's expressed more literally in My Life as a Fake but one could certainly argue Butcher's ersatz Leibovitz unleashes a Frankenstein or two of its own.
Just wondering if anyone thought it might be a worthwhile excercise to compare Carey's work on Fraud and Art, with Banville ?
Posted by: PaulSweeney | June 02, 2006 at 01:03 AM
I hadn't but that's a great idea. Perhaps specifically looking at Athena and Theft ... Now you've got me thinking, dammit!
Posted by: TEV | June 02, 2006 at 09:31 AM