The London Review of Books unzips and piddles all over Christopher Hitchens' Thomas Paine's "Rights of Man". Ouch.
... this book ... reads like the work of a tired man.
Too tired, to begin with, to check his facts. Rights of Man (not The Rights of Man, as Hitchens persistently calls it) was written as an answer to Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France, and Hitchens tells us that among others who wrote replies to Burke, along with Joseph Priestley and Mary Wollstonecraft, was William Godwin, which he wasn’t. He says that, unlike Paine, Wollstonecraft advocated votes for women, which she didn’t. Paine himself, Hitchens says, was not discouraged from writing Part One of Rights of Man by the rough treatment he received at the hands of a Parisian crowd following Louis XVI’s flight to Varennes. Nor should he have been, for Part One was published several months before the king fled and Paine was manhandled. According to Hitchens, Part Two was produced partly to explain to Dr Johnson the need for a written constitution, and partly to endorse Ricardo’s views on commerce and free trade, but when it was written Johnson had been dead for seven years and Ricardo, not yet 20, had published no views that required endorsing. Paine was charged with seditious libel for publishing Part Two, and to escape arrest he fled to France, accompanied by the Wykehamist gentleman-lawyer John Frost, described by Hitchens as secretary of the London Corresponding Society. The LCS was a society of radical artisans, not a gentleman’s club, and its secretary was in fact the shoemaker Thomas Hardy. The trial proceeded in Paine’s absence, and according to Hitchens the future prime minister Spencer Perceval ‘opened for the prosecution’; in fact, though Perceval read the indictment to the court, the prosecution was much too important to be left to so relatively junior a barrister, and was opened by the attorney general himself. In 1794 Paine published The Age of Reason, ‘probably’, thinks Hitchens, in reaction to a sermon by Richard Watson, the bishop of Llandaff, though, as Paine himself tells us, he had not heard of the sermon until it was advertised in Watson’s reply to The Age of Reason, An Apology for the Bible.
Next we hear, Hitchens will be attributing Rights of Man to the famous ghostwriter Pablo Fenjves. Oh, wait.... (And how ARE we supposed to pronounce that strange name?)
Posted by: John Shannon | November 25, 2006 at 02:55 PM
Mr. Hitchens has finally managed to spread himself too thin after having put on all those pounds.
Posted by: Ann Ominous | November 26, 2006 at 01:48 PM
This does not surprise me one bit. Did you read the Vanity Fair Bloomsday centenary piece (2004) in which Hitchens refers to Buck Mulligan's 'namesake' who appears in chapter 14? Eh, Hitch ... I think you'll find that writers quite often allow a character to dip out of the story for a while, but often reserve the right to reintroduce the same character later on.
It just made me wonder: how confusing might this make Hitch's reading of any novel!
Hitch: Ishmael and Queequeg then find themselves on another ship, coincidentally called (like the earlier whaler) The Pequod, and also coincidentally captained by Ahab's namesake ... eh, Captain Ahab...
Posted by: CK | November 28, 2006 at 12:31 PM