* The suspected killer of editor Hrant Dink has confessed. He's 17 years old. Turkey must be proud of its children.
* The Los Angeles Times reviews the Austin Lyric Opera production of Philip Glass' latest opera, "Waiting for the Barbarians," based on the brilliant novel by J.M. Coetzee.
* Salman Rushdie's next book will be a historical novel.
The new novel of internationally acclaimed British-Indian author and novelist Salman Rushdie would be a historical one, set in the 16th century that talks about the Mughal dynasty and draws comparison to its Italian counterpart.
* Despite having been on the receiving end of a textbook party snub from Philip Gourevitch at the Los Angeles launch for The Paris Review Interviews, we continue to be PR fans, and so we dutifully point you to this Boston Globe Q&A.
* NBCC Award nominee Frederick Seidel gets a close reading at the stood.
* Ian McEwan is profiled in The Independent, and John Banville gets the obligatory "torturer" nod.
* Colin Miner gets Norman Mailer to come out of his shell at the NY Sun.
As for other serious writers, Mr. Mailer knows they are out there ("I hear Dave Eggers is wonderful," he said), but doesn't read nearly as much as he used to. "I almost don't read anyone anymore," he said. "The older I get, the more sensitive I've become to good writing. It stimulates me immensely, and then I go off in all sorts of directions thinking about how I would've done it. And my mind races and it distracts me from my own work. And so I rarely read a good writer anymore."
If that doesn't get you your Mailer fill for the day, he's also over at EW.com. (Thanks to Michael Orbach.)
* Zadie Smith's Write Better is concluded at the Guardian with Read Better, where she appears (to these eyes) to be grinding an axe or two.
This is really a posh way of saying different strokes for different folks, a simple enough truth and yet one the corrective critic refuses to recognise. He has decided there is only one worthy mission in literature*. It is a fortunate coincidence that it happens to coincide with his own prejudices and preferences. The pointlessness of penalising Bret Easton Ellis for failing to be Philip Roth, or giving Thomas Bernhard a rap on the knuckles for failing to be Alice Munro, does not occur to him. All he sees are writers who lack the qualities he has decided are the definition of good literature. But while it may be true that Douglas Coupland understands little of the pastoral, Coupland understands the outlines of a cubicle perfectly, and his failure to comprehend the first is his illumination of the second. And although it's certainly the case that Philip Larkin was incompetent when it came to the idea of women, it happens that women were not his business - his business was death.
* The American, which bills itself as "a magazine of ideas for business leaders ... Modeled on Henry Luce's original vision for Fortune Magazine," has posted its list of The Ten Best Business Novels.
* And finally, we urge you to stop over and visit our best friend's second foray into blogging as he returns to Mets Fantasy Camp in Florida, trying to understand what sends a certain kind of approaching-middle-age guy off in search of baseball dreams.
So I run into Bobby Wine in the locker room. "What's your name?" has asks me. Happiness washes over me. "Brown," I tell him. "Are you any good?" has asks. Oh, well. This can't be the way big league scouts do it.
* TEV NOTE: Hmm. Who could she possibly mean?
Zadie's got his number, alright.
Posted by: Steven Augustine | January 22, 2007 at 10:36 AM
That Rushdie book could be all right if he behaves himself.
Posted by: genevieve | January 24, 2007 at 12:37 AM