We admit we're total suckers for books like The Top Ten: Writers Pick Their Favorite Books, edited by J. Peder Zane. It's the kind of open-to-any-page-and-entertain-yourself kind of title that we love. The book is divided between the authors' lists themselves and a handy guide to the selected titles, in order of popularity. (Anna Karenina tops the sheer vote total list with 171 "points"; David Mitchell's "wild card", Lolly Willowes - the first selection of the Book of the Month Club - closes out the list.) The lists all seem to be accurate and occasionally illuminating reflections of their makers' concerns, including what we can only assume to be David Foster Wallace's ironic inclusion of titles like Red Dragon (Thomas Harris), Fear of Flying (Erica Jong), and The Sum of All Fears (Tom Clancy). Or not. Which would explain a great deal.
John Banville's own, considerably more interesting, top ten list is reproduced herewith:
1. Ill Seen, Ill Said by Samuel Beckett
2. Notes from the Underground by Fyodor Dostoevsky
3. Ulysses by James Joyce
4. Doctor Faustus by Thomas Mann
5. Moby-Dick by Herman Melville
6. Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov
7. Austerlitz by W.G. Sebald
8. Dirty Snow by Georges Simenon
9. Gulliver's Travels by Jonathan Swift
10. Vanity Fair by William Makepeace Thackeray.
There are all sorts of entertaining cross indexes, as well: The top work of the 20th century (Lolita); Author with the most works represented (Shakespeare); Top work by a living author (One Hundred Years of Solitude) and a copious list of "one hit wonders." The book is available now from W.W. Norton and promises hours of diversion for the bibliophile in your life.
What, no "Saturday"?
Posted by: Jimmy Beck | February 01, 2007 at 10:08 AM
read the book at Barnes and Noble this afternoon and was going to tell you about it. I found it interesting also.
Posted by: Paul | February 01, 2007 at 09:21 PM
Not enough Pynchon!
Posted by: Tyrone Slothrop | February 03, 2007 at 04:10 PM
Surprised that Banville's list contains no curve-balls! (No Mervyn Peake? Ronald Firbank? Kathy Acker? *Laugh*...)
Posted by: Steven Augustine | February 04, 2007 at 02:57 PM
Re: "Not enough Pynchon!" Isn't it the usual trick among famous writers to praise only the brilliant dead or the vastly inferior contemporaries?
Posted by: Steven Augustine | February 04, 2007 at 02:59 PM
This book is going to get me into big trouble. My house is already chockablock with books and I have a bad feeling that I will need to buy copies of all 544 books (at least those I do not own) and lock myself in my study and read until the bank comes to repossess my house.
Actually though, this kind of book could be embarrassing. I mean, what if you are a "top writer" but you have no taste at all? Sort of like DFW (unless he's just kidding). Even worse would be answering with titles you think that everyone would expect you to list but in fact you have never read. Then, at your next interview someone asks you about Book X and you get to sit there with a blank look on your face, drool beginning to form. Ugh.
I'm still wondering why I didn't appear on any of the lists though.
Posted by: Jamie | February 06, 2007 at 05:18 AM
I went to Illinois State during the period Wallace taught there. I can say with complete certainty that Harris' novels inclusion is not "Irony." Wallace actually taught that novel to undergrads a number of times.
Posted by: zk | February 06, 2007 at 06:49 PM