At his Top Ten blog, J. Peder Zane delves more deeply into the mystery of David Foster Wallace's top ten list:
Now, this is just one interview, but never have any of the novels he mentioned on his list appeared anywhere in the interviews I've read. Nor have I ever heard him praise any books even remotely like those books. He has also, I might add, written long, fawning essays about Dostoevsky and Kafka, and claimed to be a huge John Updike fan --somehow none of these authors made his cut.
DFW's list has the whiff of a PoMo gag to it and it's probably easily dismissed as such. Far more interesting to us (given our well-known indifference to his work) is this nugget in an interview that Zane excerpts:
Donald Barthelme, especially a story called "The Balloon," which is the first story I ever read that made me want to be a writer ...
Which might be the first thing we've ever found to agree with him about - "The Balloon" has always been our favorite Barthelme story, a lovely, luminous thing. If you don't know it, seek it out ... (Actually, we also agree with his stance on irony and only wish he actually incorporated it into his own work.)
I've noticed this tendency, in musicians with a lot of "indie cred," that when asked what they are listening to, they often name a lot of things that their fans would not be caught dead admitting to listing as a favorite. For example, I one time read a list by the members of the Flaming Lips, and the list was full of things like "Stevie Nicks," "Elton John," etc. It seemed to be less than sincere, and almost a way of thumbing their nose at their fanbase, by distancing themselves from their fans who crave everything "cool" and "current." (I'm not saying Stevie Nicks and Elton John didn't make great music, but you wouldn't expect them to rate highly with experimental pop rockers.)
Similarly, when I read or hear interviews with really good, gourmet chefs, they will often profess to like things that the rest of us consider gross; one such interview that pops to mind was a guy who was saying he likes his Pho noodles with a lot of gristle mixed in. This is almost a kind of reverse-snobbery; by liking what the rest of us consider offal, the artist/writer/chef gets credit for especially rarefied taste, taste that knows no boundaries, is democratically discriminating, and is impossible to disgust.
My guess, then, is that David Wallace is either lampooning the tendency of serious artists to distance themselves from what their fans would expect them to like -- thus demonstrating they are not prey to the herd mentality of their fans -- or he is seriously indulging in this distancing maneuver himself. I have read Tom Clancy before, and I do not think it is possible for a serious novelist of Wallace's stature to take Clancy's work seriously ... it's simply too bad. I think David Foster Wallace meant to make his list almost all "gristle," and whether he did it out of a mischievous desire to lampoon snobbery, or out of real snobbery, is up to us to guess.
Posted by: James | March 14, 2007 at 09:57 PM