From Editor Keith Gessen, August 25, 2004 (They apparently didn't hate blogs then.)
Dear Mark,
We sent you an n+1 about a month ago, and I just wanted to make sure you received it. You're not under any obligation to write about us, of course, except... well, except that you are. Of course. No such thing as a free n+1. I look forward to it.
Best,
Keith
* The first of an irregular featurette, charting the evolution of n+1's stance toward litblogs.
Ooooh, this oughta be good. Can't wait for the next episode.
Posted by: Pete | March 14, 2007 at 11:37 AM
I've been waiting for something like this to surface. I can remember that even back to 2005 they didn't seem as hostile as they do now. Thanks for posting this (impending) series.
Posted by: amcorrea | March 14, 2007 at 01:01 PM
Oh man. Talk about keeping us coming back. :)
Posted by: ed | March 14, 2007 at 01:27 PM
you should start an n+1 email posting contest
http://www.edrants.com/oscar07/?p=36
http://reader-of-depressing-books.blogspot.com/2005/10/my-entire-correspondence-with-n1.html
Posted by: tao | March 14, 2007 at 03:05 PM
For the record, that email was written after Mark emailed to request Issue 1, which we sent despite never having heard of him. It seemed like the polite thing to do.
He never did write us up.
Posted by: Keith Gessen | March 14, 2007 at 04:41 PM
Quite true - and I missed including your first reply, that TEV looked quite good. I'll dig that one up and throw it in. And I only write up a fraction of what I receive. Unlike n+1, it's just me here.
As I noted at The Millions, for a grou of guys who disdain litblogs, you seem unable to resist following every word about yourselves.
And - ouch - you'd never heard of me. That's cutting, Keith. I am chastened.
Posted by: TEV | March 14, 2007 at 04:48 PM
this is strange
Posted by: tao | March 14, 2007 at 06:06 PM
I find this squabbling uninteresting.
Posted by: Alex | March 14, 2007 at 08:15 PM