The LA Weekly usefully surveys the independent bookstore scene with profiles on Book Soup, Dutton's, Skylight, et alia, although they seem to have overlooked Metropolitan on Melrose.
And yet, there are reasons aplenty to make the drive past the mailbox. Not the least of which is being in a place where the newest best stories get talked about, where communities form, where the gawky teenager you meet behind the register could very well be the next Rowling, Grisham, DeLillo, Rushdie, Lethem or Boyle, where it’s highly likely that you can meet the current Rowling, Grisham, DeLillo, Rushdie, Lethem or Boyle. Or, if all else fails, and none of that impresses, you can always pick up another copy of The Da Vinci Code.
They get to Metropolis on the back-end of the articles, in the "A Few of Our Fav Neighborhood Bookstores" section. Small blurbs about other bookstores. You'd have to read the entire article to find it.
Overall, I thought this article was poorly written, the kind of thing you might find in a really bad campus newspaper. The author fails to connect LA bookstores to LA itself, fails to analzse any trends in bookselling, fails to explore or even suggest why these stores succeed when others fail. The author engages numerous cliches and falls back on "personality reporting," which is I suppose the meat of the "inside" story.
It's too bad really because something very intelligent and informative could have been written about these stores. Each of them manages to survive and thrive in a mostly illiterate city in times where Amazon commands 30% of the market and "superstores" stalk the land, with Wal-Mart becoming one of the larger "booksellers" in America.
Instead, the inexperienced and inarticulate author chose to focus on the people, calling one bookshop owner a "goof" and managing to portray one staff member as barely sane. It's no wonder that no one takes the LA Weekly seriously. They assign a feature story like this to a "reporter" who until recently was the "calendar editor," one who lacks writing talent as well as the ability to properly interview subjects. Such is the state of contemporary journalism, I suppose.
Posted by: Cal Godot | May 18, 2007 at 08:26 AM