The New York Times reports that James Wood has decamped The New Republic for The New Yorker.
“Because James is so deeply intelligent and because the world of fiction and the world of ideas mean so much to him, he is a critic with passionate views,” David Remnick, editor of The New Yorker, wrote in an e-mail message. “But in no way is he a slam artist, an agenda keeper. He is also capable of passionate praise.”
Leon Wieseltier, as usual, can't resist making a fool of himself.
Leon Wieseltier, literary editor at The New Republic, said that “The New Republic plays many significant roles in American culture, and one of them is to find and to develop writers with whom The New Yorker can eventually staff itself.”
Somewhere, Cynthia Ozick is canceling her New Republic subscription.
Posted by: SD | August 07, 2007 at 09:08 PM
I find schadenfreude ever so tasty when it's flavored with Leon Wieseltier's bitterness in defeat.
Posted by: Ron Hogan | August 07, 2007 at 10:05 PM
I don't always agree with him, but I admire Wood and enjoy his writing.
However my flesh will burn and crisp and peel if I touch a copy of The New Yorker.
Perhaps a pair of protective gloves is in my future.
Posted by: Cal Godot | August 08, 2007 at 09:08 AM
I'm not a Leon Wieseltier partisan, but I don't see anything outrageous or stupid in his comment. The New Yorker does tend to poach writers who have developed a following or demonstrated talent working for other periodicals. I think Wood is a brilliant writer, and I know he and Wieseltier have worked closely together at The New Republic, so I can understand Wieseltier's chagrin. I do, however, look forward to Wood appearing regularly in The New Yorker.
Posted by: Ed Hawkins | August 08, 2007 at 06:47 PM
C'mon, now. Wieseltier's response is clever. In fact, it's worthy of the New Yorker.
Posted by: Stanley | August 27, 2007 at 01:59 PM