Go read for a literary journal. Or for a publishing house. Or for a literary agent. Do it for free. Pay for the right to do it if you must. It's the reason I'm a writer today. I always wanted to write fiction, but I didn't think I was good enough. Then, after college, I read fiction submissions at a magazine, and I saw how bad most of the submissions were and I felt inspired. If others were willing to try and fail, I should be willing to try and fail too. If it weren't for this experience, I'd probably be teaching political theory in some small college in the midwest, which was pretty much the direction I was heading in. Working at this magazine gave me the right combination of encouragement and perspective. It made me realize that if I worked hard I could probably write a better story than the great majority of the people who were submitting to that magazine. It also made me realize that that wasn't good enough--that your work could be better than 99 percent of the submissions and it still wouldn't be published because only one in a thousand stories got accepted. It made me realize that the odds were astronomical, which also in its own perverse way was encouraging. It taught me not to take rejection personally--that so much luck is involved in what gets published. It also taught me that editors will do anything not to read past the first sentence. A typo? A grammar mistake? Forget it. And it's not because editors are jerks. They're just overworked like everyone else and are looking for any excuse not to read on. Working at that magazine taught me to revise and revise and revise if I wanted to have a chance. It's a lesson I've never forgotten, and every student that I've convinced to become a reader at a journal has learned that lesson too and been grateful for it.
Very good advice - to find out how fiction is being written today by reading submissions. Reading your post reminded me of a story in the New Yorker I tried to read last night ("The Cold Outside" by John Burnside in the Oct. 29 issue). The first sentence and paragraph are so clumsy that it almost made me dizzy trying to figure out who, what and where . I had to call it quits on the second page after that start.
I don't bring this up to rag on the story. Obviously I'm not the author's ideal reader. Rather I'd say that even published stories of the 1 out of 1000 class can meet the "do anything to not to read past the first sentence" test. Clarity and focus from diligent revising is very much in the author's best interest (and the harried editor's interest as well!)
Posted by: Jim L | November 12, 2007 at 11:52 AM
Since most of us will never end up with a job like that an alternative would be to join a site like Zoetrope where writers submit stories and poems to be critiqued. It's easy to say that you didn't like a story but not so easy always to say why it is a bad/poor/weak story.
They always say that if you want to improve your writing you should read a lot and that's fine but how many of us are likely to sit down with the metaphorical pen and paper after we've read the latest Ian McEwan?
Posted by: Jim Murdoch | November 12, 2007 at 12:50 PM
It certainly isn't easy to articulate why and how a story isn't working. But Joshua's right that reading for a magazine/journal is always a smart move for writers. The journal I helped edit responded personally to every submission. We rejected 99% of the submissions we received and had to say why in a few sentences, all while gingerly carrying the writer's ego.
Posted by: Andrew Scott | November 12, 2007 at 07:33 PM