One of the few things that can rouse us from our headache stupor: James Wood on J.M. Coetzee. (Via.)
The pieties of current criticism are supposed to forbid one to inquire about Coetzee’s relation to this strain of theology. We are warned that it is naïve to confuse author and character, even when—especially when—that character is also a novelist. But if Coetzee’s novels deflect such inquiries, they also invite them, not least because of the provoking extremity, even irrationality, of their ideas. In the last entry of this novel, “On Dostoevsky,” Señor C writes:
I read again last night the fifth chapter of the second part of The Brothers Karamazov, the chapter in which Ivan hands back his ticket of admission to the universe God has created, and found myself sobbing uncontrollably.
It is not the force of Ivan’s reasoning, he says, that carries him along but “the accents of anguish, the personal anguish of a soul unable to bear the horrors of this world.” We can hear the same note of personal anguish in Coetzee’s fiction, even as that fiction insists that it is offering not a confession but only the staging of a confession. His books makes all the right postmodern noises, but their energy lies in their besotted relationship to an older, Dostoyevskian tradition, in which we feel the desperate impress of the confessing author, however recessed and veiled.
We can't help but note, with a pleasure that longtime TEV readers will understand, that we also fastened on the Karamazov reference - albeit with considerably less elegance. (See our Recommended sidebar.)
I've never read any Coetzee, and reading the advance notices for his new book I feel I need to rectify this quickly. Anyone have thoughts on the best place to start? Can I start with "Diary of a Bad Year" and work my way back or should I start with "Waiting for the Barbarians," Life & Times of Michael K" or "Discgrace?" Reading around about him it seems those are the must read older books. Is that right? Any thoughts would be much appreciated as I feel woefully behind the curve here and could use some advice in trying to catch up.
Thanks.
Posted by: jmscher | December 19, 2007 at 10:18 AM
I would not necessarily recommend starting with Diary. Any of the other three make truly excellent starting points. My own vote would be for Disgrace but, truly, Barbarians or Michael K would be equally fine. Ideally, I'd say read all three before taking on Diary. Either way, I envy someone about to encounter him for the first time.
Posted by: TEV | December 19, 2007 at 10:24 AM