* The City Council has spoken - Bukowski's digs are now a landmark. (A tour bus company has already leapt at the opportunity.)
"Hollywood is famous not because everybody has been a saint or a nun," Los Angeles City Councilman Eric Garcetti told Reuters last week. "It's always attracted complicated and important people and Charles Bukowski certainly fits that mold."
* On the other hand, across town, Beyond Baroque is in danger of following in Dutton's footsteps.
* The Village Voice reviews three, um, depressing French novels. Which actually sound kinda cool. Which tells you something about us.
* Tom Wolfe is to receive the Carl Sandburg Literary Award ... which we can only assume has something to do with best use of exclamation marks!
Currently Wolfe is working on Back to Blood, a book set in Miami’s immigrant communities — set for a 2009 release.
Oy. We wait not.
* Speaking of Wolfe, the current issue of Poets & Writers features a lengthy interview with editor Pat Strachan.
* Tim Lott wonders what has happened to love in literature, and then goes to Richard Curtis for his answer, who delivers more or less precisely what you dread, um, expect.
* We're thinking that "outsider" is an increasing inaccurate label for Cormac McCarthy but the Independent is running with it.
For acolytes, McCarthy has over the past decade become the alpha and omega of American fiction. When, last year, the New York Times Book Review polled 200 writers and critics to determine the 25 best American novels of the past quarter-century, McCarthy's gory historical landmark from 1985, Blood Meridian, came third (behind only Toni Morrison's Beloved and Don DeLillo's Underworld). The Border Trilogy that occupied McCarthy through the 1990s – All the Pretty Horses, The Crossing and Cities of the Plain – also made the cut.
* Robert Frost, it appears, was all about the patronage.
``I'm glad there are some,'' he added, ``foolish enough to take care of fool poets. We'd lose all that when capitalism goes, you know,'' he said according to the AP.
* The mighty Lorin Stein on Norman Rush's Mortals, a James Wood favorite.
"Mortals" is one of those rare long books that's fun to read but no fun to review. The characters--expatriates in Botswana, as in "Mating"--are full of ideas (about marriage, Christianity, race, economic development, etc) and you can't tell which ones the author shares. Ordinarily the plot would sort these things out in a hurry. Most novels are justice machines. But Rush keeps you in suspense. Real, uncomfortable suspense--ideological suspense. The kind that reviewers tend to find "messy". ("Rush's attempts to meld political reality with domestic tragicomedy occasionally make the narrative unwieldy," Publishers Weekly)
* The Canadian press has picked up Sheila Heti's dream project.
* Novelist Peter Smith has a fine photo essay on writers' houses.
* Emma Garman profiles Philippe Grimbert for Nextbook.
He’s not exaggerating. An unexpected international sensation, Un Secret has sold 700,000 copies in France alone (more than double the sales of Michel Houellebecq’s last novel; the only literary work to have had similar success in France in recent years is another World War II novel by a Jewish author, Jonathan Littell’s Les Bienveillantes). Soon after Un Secret’s 2004 publication it became clear that this spare, unsentimental novel was hitting a nerve. Raves—“a very beautiful work, its content matching its form in their wondrous simplicity” (Figaro); “a splendid book that gives the unspeakable written form” (Le Monde)—were followed by awards: the Prix Goncourt des Lycéens, the Prix des Lectrice d’Elle, and the Prix Wizo for the best work of Jewish interest in French literature. In the three years since, the novel has been translated into twenty-two languages, published in thirty-five countries, and adapted by director Claude Miller into an acclaimed movie now on the festival circuit. This month it finally arrives in U.S. bookstores under the title Memory.
* Michael Gorra considers the problem of a Venice that exists for tourists only.
* Bill Moyers asks "What book should the winning presidential candidate take to the White House?" Us, we're thinking Harry, Revised but we probably have an agenda.
* And, finally, we're kinda grammar/style geeks, it's true, but we find this kind of stuff endlessly fascinating.
"Critique is a noun. If you want a verb, try criticise."
I'm confident there's justice in quibbling with that.
Posted by: Steven Augustine | February 27, 2008 at 12:39 AM
So i m guessing no gay love story could take the vote of the president of the judging panel for Le Prince Maurice prize for literary love stories.....
Gay or Heterosexual, love is love!
Posted by: blue cave | February 27, 2008 at 03:41 AM
btw, the P&W piece is not with Tom Wolfe, but Tobias Wolfe
Posted by: elcalifornio | February 27, 2008 at 06:25 AM
Sorry, elcalifornio, you are incorrect. From the first page:
True to form, she ducked the opportunity to take any personal credit, replying, “I can barely believe my great good fortune in being able to work with Tom Wolfe again. His new novel will be both an enormous amount of fun and an important reckoning with our times, as readers know to expect of Tom.”
Posted by: TEV | February 27, 2008 at 07:07 AM
Apologies Mark,
I was mistaken by the cover article, which concerns Tobias not Tom. Didn't realize two Wolfes were discussed in one mag. I guess they're not so extinct anymore.
Posted by: elcalifornio | February 27, 2008 at 07:58 AM
Thanks for linking to my Nextbook piece! (And for the Economist link, which I just bookmarked with tragic relish.)
Posted by: Emma | February 27, 2008 at 10:04 AM
Funny, I just read another essay (the manifesto featured today in LROD) that talks about the dearth of love in short fiction today, and it asks for C Michael Curtis' view...
Posted by: gerber | February 27, 2008 at 01:18 PM
That Economist style guide is excellent. Thanks for the link. As someone who often writes quickly and thus inaccurately, I'm amazed when I go back in for a "tight edit" and find that I can kill 70% of the words and lose none of the meaning.
Posted by: callie | February 27, 2008 at 02:44 PM
Love stories? "Strides" by Stephen Foster is one of the best novels of the 1990s, and it's a classic love story as well as a great novel. I've written a review of it: just click the "Nugae" link below.
Posted by: Nugae | February 27, 2008 at 03:24 PM
"Triggering the Grand Irrationality?"
Cowering in an obscure corner of the food pyramid
somewhere between the tofu and the unflavored yogurt
contemplating the juxtaposition of intangibles for all you are worth.....
Posted by: poetryman69 | February 28, 2008 at 03:51 AM
gerber, that essay must explain why i keep turning back to the vintage classics in paperback. i am a bit distraught at the implications it makes, however: that a writer like scott fitzgerald would not be supported/published today. are we all that stupid?
Posted by: carmen | February 28, 2008 at 06:58 AM
Last week, when Amy Hempel spoke at the Hammer, she said that every short story could be titled "The Day I Was Sad" (she's also said every story could be called "Christmas") and perhaps that speaks larger to the issue of missing love in contemporary fiction than anything else. I think the last novel I read that actually dealt with love was On Chesil Beach. And, well, I can't say I liked it.
Posted by: tod goldberg | February 28, 2008 at 12:31 PM