Needless to say, we disagree with Marilyn Stasio's bewildering take on The Silver Swan (which we thought even better than the excellent Christine Falls). What's most confusing to admitted non-genre types like ourselves (and what follows is not an invitation to unleash the usual flame barrage) is this assertion:
Black has given himself plot headaches by meddling with some techniques of the trade he mastered so brilliantly in “Christine Falls.” Departing from the convention of allowing the reader to follow the story from the detective’s perspective, Black runs Quirke’s private investigation on a parallel track with the victim’s own story, told in intimate flashbacks.
Saints preserve us, such esoteric, outré literary devices! As Ms. Stasio reaches for the reassuring comfort of The Cat Who Could Read Backwards, we ponder her closing:
But the conventions of crime fiction provide structural security for any exploratory attack on the subject of evil (or sin, as Black’s characters are more apt to define it), and failing to take full advantage of that freedom is like traveling all the way to Ireland and neglecting to visit either a church or a pub.
Now, we know that the whole ongoing clash between the so-called literary and the so-called genre is a touchy subject, tedious to most (including ourselves) and made increasingly irrelevant by efforts of the likes of Michael Chabon and Jonathan Lethem. But it would seem to us that it's precisely this sort of slavish devotion to form that renders the form less interesting to those with more (yes) literary leanings. Sure, we understand that there are rules, but we also understand that art routinely breaks rules in pursuit of greatness. (Now, we're not even going to go near the whole "erotica" v. literary fiction thing, especially since Rupert Smith has it so, ahem ably in hand ... )
At any rate, we urge you to ignore Ms. Stasio's confining notions of what makes a good read and check out this wonderfully moody novel for yourself.
Comments