« ON THE ROAD AGAIN | Main | A BRIEF RANT »
The comments to this entry are closed.
In his recent TEV guest review of Home Land, Jim Ruland called Sam Lipsyte the "funniest writer of his generation," and we're quite inclined to agree. We tore through Home Land in two joyful sittings and can't remember the last time we've laughed so hard. Lipsyte's constellation of oddly sympathetic losers is rendered with a sparkling, inspired prose style that's sent us off in search of all his prior work. In Lewis Miner's (a.k.a Teabag) woeful epistolary dispatches to his high school alumni newsletter ("I did not pan out."), we find an anti-hero for the age. Highly, highly recommended.
This is a truly yummy picture. I am saving it. I think it will come in handy in the future. Thanks for sharing!
Posted by: Megan | August 23, 2008 at 09:31 PM
A nice collection! I'm curious to know how you use the novels...are they all examples to admire, or do you use certain texts to show weaknesses?
Posted by: Zoe | August 23, 2008 at 11:58 PM
Wondering why ECLIPSE is in there? (I am a Banville Fan), just wondering why that novel.
Posted by: paulSweeney | August 24, 2008 at 01:48 AM
Yep: would love 20 words on each of these choices. Unpack, sir!
Posted by: JMartin | August 24, 2008 at 08:41 AM
Where is Harry, Revised? After all, one knows one's own work best, can explain the mechanics and decisions, and besides, it was terrific. Don't be bashful Mark -- give em hell and Harry!
Posted by: DW | August 25, 2008 at 02:05 PM
So, did you have Living Dead Girl in another bag or something?
Posted by: tod goldberg | August 25, 2008 at 06:57 PM
Sigh. I love Remains of the Day. Life changing, I tell ya.
Posted by: JEN | August 27, 2008 at 01:54 AM
It looks like you picked the wrong Art of Fiction. Aren't there at least two that are better than Lodge's? Maybe if you wove together the unique Arts of Fiction of Gardner, Rand, and Lodge, you could produce the most complete examination of the subject possible. Or it might be a useless mess.
Posted by: Shankweather | August 27, 2008 at 01:31 PM
At first I was struck by the James Wood text alongside Smith's "White Teeth," the object of his hysterical realism ire. But why explain hysterical realism when you can read from an example of it? Brilliant.
Posted by: DenverScribe | August 27, 2008 at 03:57 PM
@Shankweather: I agree with the better part of your comment but would change the second syllable of your penultimate word to "full."
@DW (fifth comment from the top): While putting one's own work seems terrifically narcissistic to this reader (even Nabokov didn't teach from his true masterpieces in his course at Cornell) but it would be not a little generous of Mr. Sarvas to make himself availableafter class to field such questions from his students, to explain his choices and decisions.
Posted by: SH | April 25, 2009 at 05:08 PM