I briefly interrupt my Amsterdam sojourn and Todd's guest posts to note that, although I agree with her assessment of the book itself*, Michiko Kakutani's review of Indignation makes the choice not to preserve Roth's "gotcha" - something I fretted considerably over, and handled differently, as I hope you'll see tomorrow. Given how completely the device fails, her critical approach seems fair - it was something I did, indeed, want to engage directly with but in the end I erred on the side of preserving the reader's experience ... OK, back to Todd.
UPDATE: Hitch weighs in, too, and is even less impressed. There's something reassuring about the response, and we'll write more on this later, but it isn't always easy writing that early, negative review, wondering if you're the only one missing something ...
* Of course, I vehemently object to with her facile characterization of Sabbath's Theater as "sour" and "static" ...
Roth once told a friend of mine that reading a critic is like going to a ball game and just staring at the scoreboard.
Posted by: Jack Pendarvis | September 17, 2008 at 10:20 PM