... but with the departures of Maria Russo, Scott Timberg and Veronique de Turenne, the Los Angeles Times accelerates (and just about completes) its slide into total irrelevance.
« TUESDAY MARGINALIA (LITE) | Main | SPECIAL GIVEAWAY: NOBILITY OF SPIRIT »
The comments to this entry are closed.
In his recent TEV guest review of Home Land, Jim Ruland called Sam Lipsyte the "funniest writer of his generation," and we're quite inclined to agree. We tore through Home Land in two joyful sittings and can't remember the last time we've laughed so hard. Lipsyte's constellation of oddly sympathetic losers is rendered with a sparkling, inspired prose style that's sent us off in search of all his prior work. In Lewis Miner's (a.k.a Teabag) woeful epistolary dispatches to his high school alumni newsletter ("I did not pan out."), we find an anti-hero for the age. Highly, highly recommended.
As a resident of San Francisco and sometime reader of the SF Chronicle (which as you well know, recently bought out its dedicated book section staff) I can testify that this is like ripping off a BandAid. It hurts for a second, but it was just a matter of time before it had to come off.
I seriously doubt that book reviews are even going to exist in any daily newspaper, or even on daily news websites, in 10-15 years. You may have noticed that even the New York Times Book Review has grown increasingly lame over the past year or two. I've more or less stopped reading it, personally. Frankly, I get more out of their podcast.
I'm pretty certain that the future of casual reviewing is with book blogs like yours, and for readers less dedicated, with general arts & culture sites like NPR, or KQED up here in SF. The future of serious criticism is with perhaps some 20 magazines and quarterlies (you know them) and with websites devoted to it, like The Quarterly Conversation.
Posted by: Jeremy Hatch | October 28, 2008 at 12:25 PM
The LA Times decline is infuriating and frustrating. From what I've read, the paper isn't doing *that* badly, but Sam Zell's highly leveraged purchase of the paper (and Tribune Co.) has forced him to make huge cuts. Can someone already step up and buy back the LA Times from Zell, someone like Eli Broad or David Geffen, an LA native who could actually support -- financially and otherwise -- this recently great paper? It's sad to watch what's happening over there.
Posted by: Jacob Silverman | October 28, 2008 at 10:27 PM
But then who would tell me how to vote? Seriously, who can follow superior court judge races?
Posted by: K | October 28, 2008 at 11:49 PM