* Amos Oz has been presented with the Heinrich Heine Prize. (Must ... not ... make ... infantile ... heiny joke ... Serious people are reading.)
The jury said it chose to honor Oz for his "literary quality, political sensibility, his humanitarian engagement and his bold clarity and determination in trying to build bridges between Israelis and Palestinians."
* Publishing layoffs continue, as Macmillian announces job cuts.
* A top ten list we're actually interested in - James Wood shares his ten favorite books of 2008. Of course, we always follow - and you should, too - The Millions' annual Year in Reading roundup, unfolding as we speak.
* Variety considers the fate of Fitzgerald adaptations. (And, holy shit, is the Benjamin Button one-sheet the ugliest damn thing you've ever seen?)
Selznick, a Fitzgerald fanatic, would never achieve his goal of producing "Tender" or "Tycoon," but he did recruit Fitzgerald into his stable of writers who toiled on "Gone With the Wind." Although Selznick held Fitzgerald the novelist in high regard, he called his early screen treatments "awful" and ultimately discarded his contributions. Nevertheless, at $1,250 a week, Fitzgerald was treated like royalty, even if the emperor had no clothes.
* The contents of the defunct Gotham Book Mart have found their way to the University of Pennsylvania Libraries.
* We've been privileged to read Maud Newton's novel-in-progress through various stages but for the first time the general public gets to see what she's been up to, and it's well worth the one-time three dollar charge to read "When The Flock Changed" at Narrative Backstage. However, if you're too cheap to pop for the read, Maud advises that it will be freely available down the line. But don't wait. It's accomplished, disturbing and vivid.
* The MSNBC travel section declares Berlin, Dublin and Boston the three best cities for bookworms.
* Times have changed but not that much. The Guardian profiles the Belarus Free Theatre, "an underground company set up to perform uncensored work in Europe's last bastion of dictatorship."
"Our performances are very complicated. We perform in apartments that are very small and we cannot speak loudly for fear of being arrested," says Natalia Kolyada, who founded the company with her husband Nikolai Khalezin, a playwright and formerly a well-known journalist before his newspaper was closed down. "The audiences are notified by text message or emails and told to go to a meeting point, then we bus them to the location of the performance. If too many turn up, we put them on a waiting list." That list is now 2000 names long.
* But will Robert Louis Stevenson be given a Facebook page?
* Critical Mass gets a makeover.
* Do have a look at Stefan Collini's smart essay on Lionel Trilling over at The Nation.
The scale of the book's success on first publication seems scarcely credible today. It belonged, after all, to a genre most present-day publishers shun as utterly unsalable. It was a collection of essays; the essays had all been previously published in some form; and perhaps most unpromising of all, they were essays in literary criticism. Yet the hardcover sold an initial 70,000 copies, and then the paperback a further 100,000. Menand remarks that the volume "made literary criticism matter to people who were not literary critics," which is true enough but may understate its reach. A similar work that sold, say, 20,000 copies would already be doing that. The Liberal Imagination made Trilling's version of literary criticism matter to a readership that was in search of something more than criticism, perhaps more than literature itself. His essays spoke to a cultural or political moment in a way that is now hard to reconstruct and surely impossible to repeat. But why does it seem unimaginable that any work by a literary critic might have a similar impact now? Has "the culture" changed too much? Has "literary criticism"? Have "we"?
* Le Clézio's Nobel lecture underwhelms Marie Arana at the Washigton Post. We haven't read it yet, though we plan to, but her assertion that Le Clézio's invocation of Stig Dagerman was "written to please his Swedish jurors" strikes us a bit cynical. It can also be interpreted as a gesture of courtesy to one's hosts. But we defer final judgement until we read the thing. It's in the pile.
* On the other hand, if you want to read a no-holds barred great speech, check out Cynthia Ozick's address delivered on the occasion of winning the 2008 PEN/Nabokov Award.
What is the true meaning of “the madness of art”? Imposture, impersonation, fakery, make-believe—but not the imposture, impersonation, fakery, or transporting make-believe of inventive story-telling. No: rather, art turns mad in pursuit of the false face of wishful distraction. The fraudulent writer is the visible one, the crowd-seeker, the crowd-speaker, the one who will go out to dinner with you with a motive in mind, or will stand and talk at you, or will discuss mutual writing habits with you, or will gossip with you about other novelists and their enviable good luck or their gratifying bad luck. The fraudulent writer is like Bellow’s Henderson: I want, I want, I want.
* Unexpected idiocy from the Guardian: "But anybody can read a book and say what they think of it, particularly if it's fiction."
* Kodi Scheer has been award the 2008 Dzanc Prize.
* Dorothy Sterling has died.
Sterling "was a major figure in the development of 20th-century children's literature because she was one of the first people to insist upon the representation of African-Americans in that literature," said Julia Mickenberg, an American studies professor at the University of Texas, Austin.
* Susan Sontag's journal - into which we've begun to dip, with considerable pleasure - is reviewed in the New Yorker. And Zadie Smith contributes a personal essay about her father.
* Julie Curwin has won the Commonwealth Short Story Competition.
* Two of our favorite things in one volume: Graham Greene and letters. Hoping to get a copy before too long to excerpt for y'all.
With the full cooperation of the writer's estate, editor Richard Greene (no relation) has assembled several hundred letters that range from a 16-year-old Greene's detailed descriptions of fellow passengers on a sea voyage to Portugal in 1921 to a one-sentence statement, signed two days before his death in April 1991, that granted his biographer permission to quote from all copyrighted material, published or otherwise.
* Martin Amis learns the difference between fame and literary fame.
* Karan Mahajan's debut novel Family Planning gets the Weekend Edition treatment.
* The "post-racial world" headline doesn't really fit what follows (the headline writers should have read the piece a bit more closely), but Francine Prose views two books on emigration through the prism of the election.
Though neither The Other nor The Writer as Migrant is longer than 100 pages, they both seem weightier than their length would suggest. They demand to be read slowly, and savored. You may find yourself pausing frequently to think about some especially trenchant observation and to reflect on the generosity and intelligence with which these writers help us understand what makes us different from, and similar to, the people with whom we co-exist on our endlessly fascinating, precious and increasingly populated world.
* Dirda on the "eternally fresh" Robert Louis Stevenson.
* Sunday's NYT Magazine essay on David Foster Wallace has no doubt already been widely linked to, but if you missed it, you can find it here.
* Emory University has acquired a collection of nearly 700 editions of Robinson Crusoe. And one book about OCD.
* We approvingly note John Freeman's ascension to the American editorship of Granta by linking to this Joseph O'Neill nugget from Granta 72: The Ascent of Man.
* And, finally, on a personal note, we thank David Milofsky of the Denver Post for naming Harry, Revised as a Good Read of 2008.
Tuesday marginalia is back! Sweet!
Posted by: Mike | December 16, 2008 at 07:20 AM
Ah, the season of the tiresome top-ten and "best of" lists are upon us! Trying to get just the right measure of conventional wisdom and curveball . . . It's all about marketing! Nice to see James Wood participating with his high-end list of "literary" commodities . . .
Posted by: EC | December 16, 2008 at 12:56 PM
i think you misinterpreted the guardian piece. that sentence you quote was the end of a paragraph that began thus: "But for those who care about books being reviewed well, there are reasons for unease all the same. The most obvious one is what is widely called 'the democratisation of opinion'." seems to me he was simply making an observation (and after all it's true enough, isn't it? just look at amazon.com), not saying it's a good thing. no?
Posted by: grackyfrogg | December 16, 2008 at 01:46 PM
Oh thank you for linking the Cynthia Ozick address. Stunning.
Posted by: lauren | December 17, 2008 at 05:35 AM
Mark,
Best of the season to you!
Listen, for those of us not in 'the biz' what's a one-sheet? I am looking forward to seeing Benjamin Button.
Drop in over at Wisdom of the West sometime for a good read and a chat.
Also, I hate to bring it up but I never received the book I won from TEV: I think it was Henkin's Matrimony: http://marksarvas.blogs.com/elegvar/2008/09/tev-giveaway-ma.html
Best,
Jim H.
P.S. I've had a story accepted for publication, but haven't yet heard back from Writer House about my novel—though now that the market's tanked I'm not hopeful. I'll keep you up to date.
Posted by: Jim H. | December 17, 2008 at 05:53 PM
I am (I remain?) in love with Cynthia Ozick.
Posted by: Antoine Wilson | December 19, 2008 at 09:52 AM
BTW, Ozick published a version of that address on Standpoint:
http://www.standpointmag.co.uk/critique-september
Worth checking out.
Cheers,A
Posted by: Antoine Wilson | December 19, 2008 at 10:35 AM