Despite editor Marcus Brauchli's recent mealy-mouthed prevarications, the Washington Post is shuttering Book World.
According to reports from Book World employees, the last issue of Book World will appear in its tabloid print version on Feb. 15 but will continue to be published online as a distinct entity. In the printed newspaper, Sunday book content will be split between Outlook, the opinion and commentary section, and Style & Arts.
We have said it before and we'll say it again. The future of book reviewing will not be found in print dailies. As the Post's move suggests, it's online.
Or is it? I suspect that there's some lonely Bill James of books out there, in a boiler room in Kansas, preparing a print book review that will keep the art alive. Books were reviewed before there were newspapers - they'll be reviewed long after.
Posted by: Pete | January 28, 2009 at 05:10 PM
Mark, I think print reviews will survive only in specialized publications. And while I'm saddened by the loss of Book World, I think book review sections are guilty of ignoring major shifts in Americans' reading habits. Millions of Americans are in book clubs, but how many book sections write about their issues? The sections take little notice of the burgeoning book blogs. And they do little to draw readers into a conversation about books. There's still a great appetite for information -- and conversation -- about books; that's why we started The Baltimore Sun's Read Street blog.
p.s. Thanks for noting our monogamy/polygamy discussion. It has sparked dozens of comments.
Posted by: Dave at Read Street | January 29, 2009 at 11:27 AM
I agree with Pete.
Although the format may change,
book reviewing will endure.
Stephanie Barko
Literary Publicist
www.authorsassistant.com/Barko.htm
Posted by: Stephanie Barko | January 30, 2009 at 09:13 AM