Of the many tributes to John Updike pouring forth, we especially commend Joseph O'Neill's brief Granta essay to your attention.
The example of Updike is intimidating to the writer in the matter of sentences, in the matter of output, in the matter of aptitude – until, that is, one remembers that Updike himself was a stranger to intimidation, and that the Updike precedent ultimately authorizes, indeed obligates, the writer to give the task at hand his or her best shot. Like every novelist, I’ve been asked to comment on my ‘influences’, and invariably I have given a suitably wary, watery response. Nobody likes to talk about personal plumbing. But, in the interests of clarifying what it can mean to owe a literary debt, and in order to make plain the nature of the credit Updike in particular offers his fellow, lesser practitioners, here’s a confession.
To find out what he's talking about, go here.
Thanks for this, Mark. It's lovely--I skimmed it (must. do. my. work.) and will return to it. I am surprised at how saddened I am by his death.
Posted by: Anne | January 29, 2009 at 01:38 PM
Hey Mark -- Glad you liked the piece. It's a tough week, isn't it? I, like many others I suppose, took for granted we'd have those three pages a day to count upon for much longer.
Posted by: John Freeman | January 30, 2009 at 08:33 AM
Hey Mark--I heard Jonathan Lethem and O'Neill talk about Updike (and their Grants essays) last week. The conversation is available on my blog for listening.
Posted by: Rick | February 02, 2009 at 09:10 AM