The new Bookforum is now online, and the offerings include my review of John Haskell's Out Of My Skin. Here's how it starts:
Recently on NPR, Philip Seymour Hoffman gave an interview that was surprising in its awkward, fumbling banality. For example, on the difference between theater and film actors, he offered, “I’m sitting here and [theater actors are] doing it in front of me, but the only difference is that they’re doing it and I’m watching, but ultimately we’re all people hanging out in the same building.” Yet the taut intelligence of Hoffman’s performances can scarcely be gainsaid; like the work of many post-Strasberg stars, his oeuvre is a testament to an instinctive, emotional intelligence, which is not, perhaps, so easily put into words. In his earnest new novel, Out of My Skin, John Haskell—who explored his fascination with celebrity in his debut story collection, I Am Not Jackson Pollock (2003)—delves into questions of reinvention and performance. He aims to examine the fundamental question of what it means to change, but his exegesis is marred by a propensity for mundane, ersatz profundity. Even so, one is forced to wonder whether, as in the case of Hoffman, this self-conscious tic is all part of the act.
You can read the review in its entirety here.
Good review.
I read Haskell's first novel, American Purgatorio, a couple of weeks ago. Some of the problems you described in his latest one were present in the first. American Purgatorio settled into the mundane after Haskell resolved the mystery.
Posted by: Michael Czobit | January 23, 2009 at 08:03 AM
I'm sorry you didn't seem to like what I was trying to do in Out of My Skin. I have the sense that you didn't think I was being honest, or that I was pretending to be a character instead of being that character. Perhaps you've read my other books, but if you haven't, it might give you some idea of what I'm trying to do with character and with the mundane world that character inhabits. Of course there's always the possibility that you just don't like my writing, or that we have different tastes, but since we're both writers, and I imagine we're both interested in communication, I thought I'd send you a note.
All best,
Posted by: J. Haskell | February 11, 2009 at 05:12 PM
Thank you for the gracious note, Mr. Haskell. I'll reply at length privately but I certainly never doubted your honesty or the honest intentions of the work itself. I appreciate your comment here.
Posted by: TEV | February 11, 2009 at 07:32 PM