In honor of my protagonist Harry Rent, I've contributed a list of "Literature's Losers" to Bookforum's revamped website. It begins thus:
Long before Amazon.com reviewers tyrannically demanded sympathetic and likable protagonists, literature was reliably populated by leading men of a less bland stripe. It’s hard for me to understand why someone would want to spend their reading hours in the company of the virtuous, the accomplished, and the capable, when failure is so much more interesting—and, sadly, altogether more common. Today, we call them antiheroes (it’s more polite), but to me, they will always be literature’s losers—tormented, feckless, sometimes lovable, sometimes not, but almost always heartbreaking.
To find out whom I selected, pop on over and have a look ...
A reader once gave my novel a poor rating because she didn't like characters of "weak moral fibre."
Posted by: Rachael King | May 28, 2009 at 05:24 PM
Wonderful list, Mark. As a fellow writer about "losers" who is asked about them from time to time, I have mentioned that most literary characters fall into that category. I mean, are Ahab, Gatsby, Madame Bovary, Hamlet, and Raskolnikov winners?
Posted by: Jack Pendarvis | May 28, 2009 at 05:35 PM
Don Quixote
Falstaff
Moll Flanders
Tristram Shandy
Oblomov
Leopold Bloom
Yossarian
Herzog
Saleem Sinai
Josef Švejk
Most of Beckett's protagonists
Ignatius J. Reilly
Francis Enderby
Posted by: blah | May 29, 2009 at 10:59 AM
Portnoy!
the narrator of Notes from Underground
Akakii Akakievich ("The Overcoat")
Posted by: Pamela | May 29, 2009 at 04:06 PM
I don't know how anybody could forget the terrific book A Fan's Notes, by Frederick Exley. What a superb failure.
Posted by: Jason | May 30, 2009 at 08:32 PM