We are so behind and the interesting stuff keeps piling up, so here we go, down and dirty for your consumption: Check out the newly launched
The Nervous Breakdown and the latest installment of
The Critical Flame ... Floyd Skloot
considers the new Brad Leithauser novel ... Philip Roth's dreadful
The Humbling is
no more warmly received in the UK than here ... Zadie Smith's
new essay collection noted in the Guardian ... Nicholas Lezard on
Nobel Prize winner Herta Müller ... David Gates manages to set aside his chronic inverted snobbery
and turns in a surprisingly coherent look at "Nabokov's Last Puzzle" ... Martin Amis
considers same for the Guardian ... and Aleksandar Hemon thinks it
should have been left alone ... John Freeman
restores a spiked Salman Rushdie essay to Granta ... M.G. Vassanji and Kate Pullinger are
winners of the 2009 Governor General's Awards ... The Royal Family of translators,
Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky, are interviewed in the Wall Street Journal ... Su Tong's novel
The Boat Redemption has won the Man Asian Literary Prize ... Prix Goncourt winner Marie NDiaye is
shaking things up en France ... The Financial Times
reviews the second volume of TS Eliot's letters ... Oliver Marre on the
difficulty of adapting Martin Amis for the screen ... John Banville
observes that "having a god as a narrator gives you the freedom to do anything, say anything" ... The Robert Downey Holmes flick looks like a fucking noisy nightmare but if you want to
visit the film locations, the LA Times tells you how ... DO NOT MISS the
Van Gogh Museum's stunning online project - all 902 of Van Gogh's letter, annotated and illustrated ... The mighty Robert Birnbaum sits down to
chat with the mighty Tobias Wolff ... We only recently became aware of the superb trove of author interviews maintained over at the Online NewsHour -
check out the likes of Lethem, Chabon and Mantel ... David Leavitt
shares his NYRB Classics favorites with Amazon ... What they
read in the trenches (Thanks, EG) ... Nicholson Baker
chats with the gang at PopMatters ... Tóibín on
Cheever (Cheers, N) ... Jonathan Safran Foer
discusses Eating Animals with True/Slant ... Late in noting this
Q&A with FOTEV Amitava Kumar ... Eurozine
considers central European literature post-1989 (thanks again, EG) ... A Q&A with
legendary agent Georges Borchardt (ibid) ... Mad belated props to Jonathan Evison for
winning the Washington State Book Award for Fiction for
All About Lulu ... and, finally, as many of you know already, John Pipkin's lovely
Woodsburner won the Center for Fiction's First Novel Prize; as you might have guessed, we were part of the judging panel, and a post about the first novel lessons learned is in the works ... Pant, pant, pant, we're beat, smoke 'em if you got 'em, back soon!
I liked Gates' review of "The Original of Laura". Though this comment puzzled me:
"But none of the characters here, to the extent we get to know them, inspire much affection."
None of Nabokov's characters "inspire affection". That's not their function in his work. Nabokov had no interest in the aesthetic of identification between reader and character, something he pounded his readers over the head with for several decades.
Posted by: Niall | November 18, 2009 at 08:21 AM
Thanks for this Mark! You have no idea how much I appreciate these "round ups" and the paths they send me down.
Stephen
Posted by: Stephen Lovely | November 18, 2009 at 11:02 AM
Thanks for the link to the essay on central and eastern European lit. It fit right into the readings and studies I have been doing lately.
Posted by: Judy | November 18, 2009 at 11:41 AM
Thanks for the link to the PBS interviews, I often DVR their broadcast - one of the reasons being because of their arts coverage - but hardly ever have time to watch it, so this is phenomenal. I'll echo Stephen's sentiments above, you do one of the best of these types of posts around.
On an unrelated note Mark, did you ever make it through Coetzee's Summertime? I think you received that and the new Banville, and I saw remarks on the Banville, but not the Coetzee and wanted to hear your thoughts..did you review it somewhere?
Posted by: Drew | November 18, 2009 at 05:18 PM
Have you read the "dreadful" Humbling referenced in this post? I'm wondering if those finding this book dreadful are failing to consider The Roth Factor (esp. those skewering him on the cliched lesbianism). I'm by no means a Roth expert, but having started a few years ago reading his work and also about him, I'm coming to understand his fiction as self-issues-and-fantasies streaming into his protagonists' psyches. In that case, then isn't this a "dreadful but perfect" Roth?
Posted by: Kassie | November 22, 2009 at 10:51 AM