We're still digging out but we're back on the job around here with a considerable backlog of goodies ...
* During our absence, the Story Prize finalists were announced - including Victoria Patterson, recently interviewed right here at TEV.
* Speculation is rife about the potential impact of Apple's rumored tablet on the publishing industry. (Enough qualifiers there?)
* The National Book Critics Circle has announced their 2009 award finalists.
* It's been a while since Martin Amis said anything to embarrass himself, but he's starting the year off right with talk of euthanasia booths for the elderly ...
But none of those opponents were as tough as his new target promises to be. Now 60, Amis has picked a fight with the grey power of Britain's ageing population, calling for euthanasia "booths" on street corners where they can terminate their lives with "a martini and a medal".
The author of Time's Arrow and London Fields said in an interview at the weekend that he believes Britain faces a "civil war" between young and old, as a "silver �tsunami" of increasingly ageing people puts pressure on society.
(Of course, he does have a new novel on its way ... Much less annoying, here he is on Time's Arrow.)
* A recap of the Jaipur Literature Festival.
* The Big Read is headed to San Diego, taking on The Grapes of Wrath.
* Tales of woe as authors try to go it alone with minimal promotional support from their publishers. (Related: Stephen Elliott's DIY Book Tour.)
He added, "As Carolyn See (author of 'Making a Literary Life') says, your book is dead after four months. That's when they start pulling it off the shelf to make room for new books. All books die eventually, in a certain way, but I don't want to let that happen without really giving it my attention."
* Ian McEwan has become the first mainstream British author to sign an exclusive deal through Amazon to double the royalties he receives on his backlist.
* Chinamanda Ngozi Adichie on Chinua Achebe for Salon.
* Ursula K. Le Guin is rallying writers against Google Books.
Le Guin's petition includes such luminaries as notable science fiction writer Kim Stanley Robinson and Nick Harkaway, author of the bestselling debut novel The Gone-Away World.
* Peter Carey's new novel, Parrot and Olivier in America, is reviewed in the Irish Times.
* Dennis Lehane is among the many who paid tribute to Robert B. Parker, who died last week - at his writing desk - at the age of 77.
What's lost in his massive success and prodigious output is how revolutionary those early Spenser books were. He lifted the genre out of the ham-fisted macho '50s ethos it had been mostly mired in for two decades (Ross Macdonald and a few other notables notwithstanding, of course) and brought it into the '70s, all sly and sexy and edgy-funny.
* Small talk with Joyce Carol Oates at the Financial Times.
* Heller McAlpin is one of the few critics who seems to get precisely what Joshua Ferris is up to with his new novel, The Unnamed.
* Alex Clark asks whether the golden promise of the McEwan-Amis-Ishiguro generation has been fulfilled.
* Tom Stoppard interviewed in the Telegraph, wearing a fright wig, apparently.
At this point I interrupt, filling the pause, and he loses his train of thought.
A grin. ‘Perhaps that was God telling me to shut up. For a long time I managed to think two things simultaneously, that I am actually a good playwright, and that the next time I write a play I will be revealed as someone who is no good at all.
* Small publishers contemplate life without Borders.
* David Malouf and Peter Carey are amongsix Australian novelists to have new stamps in their honor.
* The Chicago Tribune suggests that Graham Greene's 1966 novel The Comedians still holds up as a portrait of Haitian despair.
* A Bollywood adaptation of Midnight's Children is in the works.
* Lest we think it's only American youth that's illiterate, the Telegraph advises that British young uns aren't much better read.
The survey suggested that nearly two in ten children thought Fagin played football for Manchester United rather than picked pockets in Dickens's Oliver Twist. And Moby Dick is, according to nearly half the children asked, a pop star not a man-eating whale.
* The University of Pennsylvania is the chosen home of the Chaim Potok papers. (Sorry, couldn't help it.)
* The Wall Street Journal on the death of the slush pile.
* Muriel Spark's 1992 autobiography is reissued in the UK.
* And, finally, Harry, Revised gets a truly lovely review in Le Monde.
What is it that McAlpin gets about the new Ferris book that other critics have missed?
Posted by: Matt | January 25, 2010 at 08:30 AM
How do we get an English translation of the review?
In light of Bloomsbury USA's twice putting white girls on the cover of books written by and about girls of color, is there any reason to expect a future edition of Harry with P Diddy in place of the Count of Monte Cristo?
Posted by: Paul T. | January 25, 2010 at 10:22 AM
Matt, McAlpin "gets" the same obvious things that others have gotten -- it's just that in order to praise them, she's willing to overlook the clumsy, unsatisfying execution. Wyatt Mason in Harper's offers a thorough critique.
Posted by: JMW | January 25, 2010 at 10:40 AM
I also found Mason's review to be one of the most even-handed I've read. I've been especially interested in reviews of this book, to see how others react. I read it last year and found it to be one of those rare books that make me angry; it came with an incredibly interesting premise, and I've read most of Ferris's other published work. At least, enough to get a sense that he's got a thoughtful approach. The disconnect between the possibilities of UNNAMED's premise, and the execution, was infuriating. It made me wonder if Ferris wrote something much larger, more dense, and was told to make it "readable" like his first book.
Whatever the case, that detective was written so poorly, my teeth ached for hours afterward.
Posted by: Matt | January 25, 2010 at 11:06 AM
Paul, I am working on a translation but here's the last graf for you:
"Mark Sarvas has accomplished a rare thing: he has written that which is never written about. The period of shock which ensues after the death of a loved one, that yawning chasm, full of emptiness--he has managed to both write it and make it funny. We enter the novel just at the moment when the main character deserts his life; we leave it when he returns to it. Harry is "revised and corrected", not because he succeeded in transforming into a modern day Edmond Dantès, but because the man he was lived through one of the most profound upsets of life, namely, that of grief."
Posted by: TEV | January 25, 2010 at 04:14 PM
Am a bit busy prepping for tomorrow night's class, and so I would ask for a little more time to be able to articulate what is bugging me about the review responses to the Ferris. It's a bit thorny also because we've become friendly, and I want to keep that dimension out of my deliberation, but it has to do with this repeated insistence or expectation that he repeat himself; it feels, in many of these reviews, like he is being punished for having the temerity to try something new. Have not read the Mason yet, will go check it out.
But in the end, I actually think there is a good deal more in common between the two books than people seem to credit - there's a very humane vision of relationships that seems to organize both these works. More soon.
Posted by: TEV | January 25, 2010 at 04:16 PM
In other news, the Wall Street Journal also announced that John Updike, Ernest Hemingway and Leo Tolstoy are no longer among the living.
Posted by: Stephan | January 25, 2010 at 08:55 PM
I get the feeling that Martin Amis, now about to turn 60, is trying ease himself into the role of Grand Curmudgeon of British Letters that his pa occupied for so long. But his pater would have thought "a medal and a martini" pretty pitiful provocation.
More than 20 years ago in London I was talking with a cool, elegant Swedish blonde - aren't they all? - who worked in the journalistic field in the UK and who told me of a party she'd attended at the home of the Swedish cultural attache the previous week. The guests of honor were a member of the Swedish Academy of Letters, the outfit that gives out the lit-Nobel, and his wife.
Both Amises were there. Kingsley arrived already sloshed and proceeded to insult the Academician's wife so brutally that even the several dozen drunken Brits present were shocked. (I can't remember the exact words, but they started with "you fat cow" according to the CESB.)
As Kingsley was lurching out of the attache's apartment after this effort, Martin caught him at the door. "Dad, it's one thing for you to throw the Nobel away, but why do you have to wreck my chances?" he asked.
"I can't f***in' believe you'd say that," said Kingsley. "You know damn well I taught you the Nobel is for f***in' foreigners, not an Englishman."
"What about Yeats and Shaw?"
"F***in' foreigners and Irish."
"Bertrand Russell?"
"Foreigners, Irish and bloody Bolshies."
"Winston Churchill?
"He was half f***in' Yank, and besides" - and here, according to the CESB, Kingsley's expression suddenly grew gravely serious and his speech less slurred - "it's a proven fact that there is no limit to the degradation a British statesman must be prepared to suffer to serve his country, and Churchill getting that medal from their f***kin' King is proof."
With that the elder Amis walked out.
Posted by: Lawrence Tate | January 26, 2010 at 06:56 AM
Martin Amis is slyly stealing a leaf from Michel Houellebecq's playbook. The war of the young against the old is a major theme of all Houellebecq's work, and I'm sure Amis has read it. It's just like the English to look to France for some fresh or notorious new idea, and then forget to attribute the source. Which probably explains the pale, exhausted state of British literature these days.
Posted by: Niall | January 26, 2010 at 10:40 AM
Martin Amis is slyly taking credit for a Futurama punchline. "Suicide Booths" are a recurring visual gag in many of the show's episodes, and, because I've seen the show recently enough to mentally connect it to this news item, I'm sure Amis must be stealing from it. It's just like the English to look to American cartoons for some fresh or notorious satire, and then forget to attribute the source. Which probably explains the pale, exhausted state of British literature and letters these days.
Posted by: Pompous | January 26, 2010 at 12:45 PM
Pompous (aptly named!) I think the likelihood that Amis reading hot new French writers is much, much higher than that he is watching crap American cartoons.
You can do better. Rewrite your post, but reference the Japanese movie "Ballad of Narayama" instead. Or even "Logan's Run". There. All better.
Posted by: Niall | January 26, 2010 at 01:32 PM
Has Naipaul died yet? Didn't think so. That being the case, Martin will need to get in line. As will Michel (whom I rate highly).
Posted by: Drew | January 26, 2010 at 06:42 PM
Indeed, that's a very good review for your book. Can hardly do better. Have you met Miss Georges? Just wondering.
Makes me want to read it. I mean... even more than before.
I'll buy it next time I see it.
And you're welcome.
Posted by: Nick | January 26, 2010 at 10:25 PM
Have not met her, though I love that she shares my daughter's name ...
Posted by: TEV | January 26, 2010 at 10:42 PM
Here's the great thing about Australians -- not to mention Australian papers for printing it -- Bryce Courtenay's remark about getting his own stamp:
''It was the king's head on stamps when I was young. Now they just put old shitbags on them.''
Posted by: Eric Weinberger | January 29, 2010 at 10:58 AM
Are these martini and a medal similar to PD James' Quietus drowning options or more like American death panels? Is anyone truly outraged by Martin Amis saying that? I just read that piece a couple of hours ago and that comment seemed a grumbly little offhand from a man upset about the prospect of aging.
Posted by: Jay Watts III | February 02, 2010 at 08:50 AM
Thanks for posting the update about Borders--
Posted by: Joelle Biele | February 02, 2010 at 05:23 PM