What are the odds that two writers should chose a 1967 novel to note in The Millions' Year in Reading project?
« MORE SALTER BITS | Main | HAPPY HOLIDAYS »
The comments to this entry are closed.
In his recent TEV guest review of Home Land, Jim Ruland called Sam Lipsyte the "funniest writer of his generation," and we're quite inclined to agree. We tore through Home Land in two joyful sittings and can't remember the last time we've laughed so hard. Lipsyte's constellation of oddly sympathetic losers is rendered with a sparkling, inspired prose style that's sent us off in search of all his prior work. In Lewis Miner's (a.k.a Teabag) woeful epistolary dispatches to his high school alumni newsletter ("I did not pan out."), we find an anti-hero for the age. Highly, highly recommended.
Hi Mark, I think there's some kind of Salter-mania going on. You'll also appreciate our writer Sonya Chung's appreciation of Salter and his ability to write sex from almost a year ago. That's what initially started all the interest in Salter for us at The Millions.
Posted by: Max | December 10, 2010 at 02:33 AM
1967 was a break-out year for US fiction, so I'm not surprised at this. And Salter's books is one of the very few credible erotic literary novels ever written in English (Fanny doesn't count, people). So it sort of wins that category by default, but also by its merits.
Posted by: Niall | December 13, 2010 at 08:12 AM
Well, I hope Salter fully enjoys Salter-mania!
Your previous comment about Charlie Rose is so funny. Writers get asked such questions! I can never think of an answer to any of them....
Posted by: Shelley | December 14, 2010 at 08:32 AM
Alsooooooo did you see the Paris Review Spring Revel - a party I found insufferably tedious the one time I went - is honoring him this year? I may have to amend my habit and attend.
Posted by: Lauren Cerand | December 14, 2010 at 03:08 PM